| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
keith

Joined: 21 Sep 2003 Posts: 24 Location: Charlotte, NC
|
Posted: Sun Sep 21, 2003 11:10 pm Post subject: Gearing info? 931 snail vs. other boxes?? |
|
|
Hey, does anyone know offhand the gearing differences between the 1980 931 snailshell (g31/02 I think?) and other available boxes? By available, I mean any that could be used for this application (in my 924S that will be naturally aspirated for a while, then turbocharged)
I've heard that 915 gears can be used in the 931, which seems to be desireable due to the availability of geariong options for the 915...
And I would think the 915 stuff is tough enough to deal with the projected horsepower...
BTW, what box did the factory run in the 924 Carrera GTs? _________________ keith
86/9 951
the RUNT. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
924 turbo

Joined: 02 Nov 2002 Posts: 1566 Location: Simi Valley, CA, USA
|
Posted: Sun Sep 21, 2003 11:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
http://www.924.org/techsection/technical.htm
Click on transaxle, then on either the PDF or the XLS transaxle calculator.
Compared to the 931/944 audi box, the gear ratios are almost identical.
The Carrera GT used a strengthened version of the G31 (G31.03).
Just my opinion, but you'd be better off finding a 951 transaxle. _________________ Jon Furst |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
keith

Joined: 21 Sep 2003 Posts: 24 Location: Charlotte, NC
|
Posted: Sun Sep 21, 2003 11:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
better off, why? _________________ keith
86/9 951
the RUNT. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
keith

Joined: 21 Sep 2003 Posts: 24 Location: Charlotte, NC
|
Posted: Sun Sep 21, 2003 11:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
better off, why? _________________ keith
86/9 951
the RUNT. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
924 turbo

Joined: 02 Nov 2002 Posts: 1566 Location: Simi Valley, CA, USA
|
Posted: Sun Sep 21, 2003 11:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Just my opinion, but the Audi-type transaxle is easier to find, cheaper to fix, and probably strong enough for your application. The G31 is quite rare (about 4000 cars delivered to the US) versus the Audi-type boxes which number over 50,000. The G31 has notoriously weak synchros, a problem which the early 928 suffers from as well. The G31 is a good transaxle, but I just think the benefits (supposedly able to withstand more torque) outweigh the costs (harder to find, more expensive to fix, weaker synchros). Of course, to use the G31, you'll also need a torque tube from a G31 car, plus a torsion tube carrier from a G31 car, plus the shift linkage from a G31 car, etc. YMMV! _________________ Jon Furst |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
keith

Joined: 21 Sep 2003 Posts: 24 Location: Charlotte, NC
|
Posted: Mon Sep 22, 2003 2:08 am Post subject: a well reasoned reply! |
|
|
Jon - thanks so much for your reply. I've been advised not to use the snail on many occasions but have never been given any real reasons not to do so, aside from the old-design synchros.
I work in a Porsche shop, so I can get guidance with the synchro replacement until I am comfortable with rebuilding this tranny.
Aside from that, I own a 1980 931 WITH LSD, which is the donor for this conversion. I've already pulled the torque tube, snailshell, rear torsion housing and suspension, and the rearmost section of the exhaust as an assembly to install in my 924S.
I've decided that I want to run late model aluminum trailing arms in this application, so I've got some work to do on the donor assembly before it goes into the car. I'm probably going to replace some tranny seals also.
So anyhow, I have all the stuff ready, and an avenue to maintain this thing, so if there aren't any known issues aside from the synchros, then all systems are go!
This will eventually be used with a 951 motor, so I guess we'll see if it holds up, huh?
BTW, anyone know what modifications were made to the G31/03 box? _________________ keith
86/9 951
the RUNT. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
CBass

Joined: 03 Nov 2002 Posts: 2807 Location: Vancouver, Canada
|
Posted: Mon Sep 22, 2003 4:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
IMO, teh LSD G31 is the most desirable transmission to have in a 924. It's a stronger transmission, being based almost entirely on the Porsche 915 transmission from the 911.
It's lighter, and mounts further forward than the Audi box, making for a slightly better handling car. Well, initially this will make for a more frontheavy car, but with battery relocation, a fiberglass hood etc, it will make for a lighter car with a better polar moment of inertia. _________________ '81 931 in various states of assembly |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
keith

Joined: 21 Sep 2003 Posts: 24 Location: Charlotte, NC
|
Posted: Mon Sep 22, 2003 5:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
hmm - interesting! _________________ keith
86/9 951
the RUNT. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
CBass

Joined: 03 Nov 2002 Posts: 2807 Location: Vancouver, Canada
|
Posted: Mon Sep 22, 2003 6:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
Of course, premature synchro wear is a factor, and it does have a funky shift pattern... The Audi box has advantages as a daily driver for that, but for a performance oriented car, the G31 has clearcut advantages.
While both trannies have about the same final drive in 5th, the G31 has shorter gears all teh way up, making for a little better acceleration.
http://www.924.org/techsection/PorscheTrans1.PDF _________________ '81 931 in various states of assembly |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
924 turbo

Joined: 02 Nov 2002 Posts: 1566 Location: Simi Valley, CA, USA
|
Posted: Mon Sep 22, 2003 10:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
| keith wrote: | | I've decided that I want to run late model aluminum trailing arms in this application, so I've got some work to do on the donor assembly before it goes into the car. I'm probably going to replace some tranny seals also. |
Since you already have the box (and it's an LSD) I suppose the G31 is the best fit for your situation.
You will need to swap the spring plates (which may or may not fit, nobody seems to know but I suppose you will find out) from your 924S to use the aluminum rear trailing arms. The mounting tabs are different and you cannot use the aluminum arms with the early spring plates. _________________ Jon Furst |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
924 turbo

Joined: 02 Nov 2002 Posts: 1566 Location: Simi Valley, CA, USA
|
Posted: Mon Sep 22, 2003 11:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
| CBass wrote: | Of course, premature synchro wear is a factor, and it does have a funky shift pattern... The Audi box has advantages as a daily driver for that, but for a performance oriented car, the G31 has clearcut advantages.
While both trannies have about the same final drive in 5th, the G31 has shorter gears all teh way up, making for a little better acceleration. |
This is true when compared to the 951-type box, but the 924S/944/931 Audi-type boxes have very very very close ratios compared to the G31. _________________ Jon Furst |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
CBass

Joined: 03 Nov 2002 Posts: 2807 Location: Vancouver, Canada
|
Posted: Mon Sep 22, 2003 3:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I was comparing to the Audi box, they have a nearly identical 5th gear ratio, but from 1st to 4th, the G31 has slightly shorter ratios.
Compared to the 951 box, there is a huge difference.
I'm a G31 fan, in case you couldn't tell  _________________ '81 931 in various states of assembly |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
-nick

Joined: 16 Nov 2002 Posts: 2699 Location: Cambridge, MA
|
Posted: Tue Sep 23, 2003 12:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
Give the folks at PowerhausII a call. They had a G31/03 box in a while ago and said it was strikingly different than the G31 incarnations.
I'm not sure what the Euro ratios are for the G31 (the G31/01 box I think).
If you've got the tranny out then _at least_ open up the front case and look at the 1st gear syncro. I would recommend pulling it apart and replacing 1-2-3 syncros while it's out. Especially if you don't know the history. There's a great writeup on the procedure in the 931 section here.
Good luck. The LSD in these box's is supposedly from a 930- however the actual part number differs by a digit at the end. They are all 40% lock I believe.
-nick |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
keith

Joined: 21 Sep 2003 Posts: 24 Location: Charlotte, NC
|
Posted: Tue Sep 23, 2003 10:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
| -nick wrote: | There's a great writeup on the procedure in the 931 section here.
|
Nick, I can't find it...?  _________________ keith
86/9 951
the RUNT. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
CBass

Joined: 03 Nov 2002 Posts: 2807 Location: Vancouver, Canada
|
Posted: Tue Sep 23, 2003 11:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
Interesting, I'd like to get my hands on one and see what the differences are.
Keith, here is the article on rebuilding the transmission, or at least 1 part of it.
http://www.924board.org/viewtopic.php?t=7969 _________________ '81 931 in various states of assembly |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|