Show full size 924Board.org
Discussion Forum of 924.org
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
 Technical FAQ924 FAQ (Technical)   Technical924 Technical Section   Jump to 924.org924.org   Jump to PCA 924 Registry924 Registry

turbo woes- HELP!!
Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    924Board.org Forum Index -> 931 Tech.
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
J1NX3D  



Joined: 06 Feb 2003
Posts: 1333
Location: New Zealand

PostPosted: Thu Jul 24, 2003 6:47 am    Post subject: turbo woes- HELP!! Reply with quote

Rats, my turbos poked! More than just oil seals wrong with it. is damaged almost beyond repair. The turbo specialist say to rebuild with new parts- and everything is damaged- will cost $4700.00.
a new unit will cost $3000.00 or i can trade in for $1800.00. 931's are a rare beast here, i know of none on nz in a wreckers yard so thats not an option. how much do they go for overseas??

also, garrett turbos are far more common here. how hard would it be to put in a garrett t25 or t28 turbo in instead of a kkk unit??
TIA
_________________
'86 944
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Lizard  



Joined: 03 Nov 2002
Posts: 9364
Location: Abbotsford BC. Canada

PostPosted: Thu Jul 24, 2003 7:08 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

to put in the Garrett, you would have to build a custom exhaust manifold though and you might have a problem attaching the CIS/lambda system
_________________
3 928s,
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
J1NX3D  



Joined: 06 Feb 2003
Posts: 1333
Location: New Zealand

PostPosted: Thu Jul 24, 2003 7:57 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

what problems could i have with the fuel injection??
-1980 931
_________________
'86 944
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Lizard  



Joined: 03 Nov 2002
Posts: 9364
Location: Abbotsford BC. Canada

PostPosted: Thu Jul 24, 2003 8:26 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

attaching the CIS/Lambda suction to the intake of the turbo
_________________
3 928s,
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
J1NX3D  



Joined: 06 Feb 2003
Posts: 1333
Location: New Zealand

PostPosted: Thu Jul 24, 2003 8:38 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

is that the only thing? does modern turbos not allow for this or is modern efi different?? im sorry i know the basics of how a turbo works but i dont know 'a' plugs into 'b' etc.

also is it possible to modify the exhaust manifold to take the new turbo rather than custom building a whole new one?
_________________
'86 944
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Lizard  



Joined: 03 Nov 2002
Posts: 9364
Location: Abbotsford BC. Canada

PostPosted: Thu Jul 24, 2003 8:58 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

second Question no, you would HAVE to build an entire new manifold.
question 1, the turbo bolts to the exhaust manifold and on the other end there is an in pipe which would go to an air filter on a car with EFI, and connects to the bottom of the CIS/lambda system on ours, the other pipe on the intake housing end of turbo connects to the charge tube
_________________
3 928s,
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
project931  



Joined: 10 Dec 2002
Posts: 95
Location: scranton, pa

PostPosted: Thu Jul 24, 2003 9:15 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

i totally disagree with lizard on this one. the manifold can be modified to take the garrett turbocharger. just cut off the current flange and weld on a garrett flange. I also believe the CIS can handle the Garret. the amount of fuel the engine recieves is regulated by the metering plate. even if the garret sucks more air then the kkk unit, it will still move the metering plate accordingly.
_________________
I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing.

please visit my website
www.deutschebags.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
J1NX3D  



Joined: 06 Feb 2003
Posts: 1333
Location: New Zealand

PostPosted: Thu Jul 24, 2003 9:19 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

sounds great project931, can someone please verify?
_________________
'86 944
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
81turbo  



Joined: 03 Nov 2002
Posts: 1065
Location: Oakland, CA

PostPosted: Thu Jul 24, 2003 9:30 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Sure welding the flage will work just fine as long as it is done well.

BUT, That is not the main concern. How the hell are you going to attatch a different turbo to the block? You are getting into some serious fabrication here. As you well know there isn't much room to play with. Also many Garrets are water cooled. Yet another complication. It would really be worth your time and money to just source a new KKK unit.

Also the CIS would not be affected by using a different turbo.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Lizard  



Joined: 03 Nov 2002
Posts: 9364
Location: Abbotsford BC. Canada

PostPosted: Thu Jul 24, 2003 9:40 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

project931 wrote:
i totally disagree with lizard on this one. the manifold can be modified to take the garrett turbocharger. just cut off the current flange and weld on a garrett flange. I also believe the CIS can handle the Garret. the amount of fuel the engine recieves is regulated by the metering plate. even if the garret sucks more air then the kkk unit, it will still move the metering plate accordingly.


the reason I say this is because it is cast steel, that stuff is almost impossible to weld too IMO or from the experiances I have had

as for the CIS I was speaking of the piping from the bottom of the lambda/metering plate section to the intake of the turbo
_________________
3 928s,
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
project931  



Joined: 10 Dec 2002
Posts: 95
Location: scranton, pa

PostPosted: Thu Jul 24, 2003 9:41 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

i think the manifold can support. mine wasn't attached when i first bought it and who knows how long the previous owner drove around like that. the turbo on my GTI is only attached at the manifold. granted its a smaller turbo.

you'll probably also have to modify the exhaust a little bit but that shouldnt be a problem.

i think the garrett would be a great upgrade especialyy if its watercooled.
_________________
I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing.

please visit my website
www.deutschebags.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
project931  



Joined: 10 Dec 2002
Posts: 95
Location: scranton, pa

PostPosted: Thu Jul 24, 2003 9:46 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
as for the CIS I was speaking of the piping from the bottom of the lambda/metering plate section to the intake of the turbo


thats true. but even if the the compressor intake is in a different location. the compressor housing can be rotated.

for example if the compressor intake ends up right under the manifold.
just loosen the bolts and rotate the housing 180 degrees so the intake ends up facing the road.
_________________
I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing.

please visit my website
www.deutschebags.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
J1NX3D  



Joined: 06 Feb 2003
Posts: 1333
Location: New Zealand

PostPosted: Thu Jul 24, 2003 11:04 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

this option is looking more and more attractive. ive left a message for my mech friend to look at this idea. i will forward all this info to him when he calls back.
as far as i know, a rebuilt kkk turbo will have to be sourced from the States. theres just none really here in nz.
_________________
'86 944
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
J1NX3D  



Joined: 06 Feb 2003
Posts: 1333
Location: New Zealand

PostPosted: Thu Jul 24, 2003 11:08 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

project931 wrote:


i think the garrett would be a great upgrade especialyy if its watercooled.


as opposed to oilcooled? whys that?
i know these turbos are an old design, would it be more beneficial to have a more modern turbo (ie garrett)?
im already getting agreement from another mech mate of mine because of price and availabity of parts, etc and theres more of a tunability market here for them. its just the act of doing the job that is an unknown right now...
_________________
'86 944
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
project931  



Joined: 10 Dec 2002
Posts: 95
Location: scranton, pa

PostPosted: Thu Jul 24, 2003 12:21 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

our turbo's are actually oil/air cooled. that's why we have that ugly NACA duct in the hood. the benefits of water cooled is the additional cooling method. if you add a watercooled turbo to our cars it'll be oil/air/watercooled.

keeping the turbo temps down helps with bearing life and oil life. i.e. less burnt oil gunking up the bearings. Also, colder intake temperatures and we all know what that means.

I was looking at a garrett turbocharger this evening out of a Merkur XR4TI and it didn't have any provisions for a bracket to mount to the block. Its about the same weight as a K26. So, I think you should be alright without the bracket.
_________________
I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing.

please visit my website
www.deutschebags.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    924Board.org Forum Index -> 931 Tech. All times are GMT + 10 Hours
Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
Page 1 of 3

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group