| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
emoore924
Joined: 13 Apr 2004 Posts: 2822
|
Posted: Fri Mar 20, 2015 9:48 am Post subject: What is interchangable between turbo and n/a short block? |
|
|
I'm thinking about building up a short block to have on a shelf that I could use for a turbo -OR- an n/a. I have a whole bunch of turbo and n/a stuff laying around that I can use.
Unfortunately, it is a mixed bag. For example I have n/a cranks and turbo rods so I'd have to combine things to build up 1 complete assembly.
I was wondering what parts are interchangeable between the turbo and the n/a and which ones are unique to one or the other so I can pick and choose my assembly parts and build something I could use for either.
Do-able? If yes, what goes with what...?
For example, Pistons: unique to n/a or turbo.
But what about:
Block?
Crank?
Con rods?
Wrist pins?
Mains?
Rod bearings?
Pan?
Oil pump?
Anything else I should know about?
Thanks!! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
WEASEL149

Joined: 19 Aug 2005 Posts: 595 Location: UK, Sheffield
|
Posted: Fri Mar 20, 2015 10:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
Main difference is pistons. Other parts can interchange.
I have an almost new NA bottom end that I will build up as a spare turbo short block.
The NA pistons seem to take more abuse. They also have a larger top ring land and larger compression rings.
All I will do is deck the block some to get the CR acceptable when using the turbo head.
The rods i'm having made will go in this block.
If I was to use it with NA head the CR will be just over 10:1 so still fine and will make more power with higher CR. _________________ 1979 UK 932 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
emoore924
Joined: 13 Apr 2004 Posts: 2822
|
Posted: Fri Mar 20, 2015 11:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
So, are you saying that if I deck the block appropriately that I could use a pure n/a setup for the bottom end to build out a turbo -- n/a pistons, rods, crank, all of it??
I'm thinking then that I could assemble a n/a spec short block. Then if I need to use it for a turbo setup, I could deck the block and stick a turbo head on it...? Or do I have to deck the block before I put it all together?
Hmmmm... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
WEASEL149

Joined: 19 Aug 2005 Posts: 595 Location: UK, Sheffield
|
Posted: Fri Mar 20, 2015 1:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| emoore924 wrote: | So, are you saying that if I deck the block appropriately that I could use a pure n/a setup for the bottom end to build out a turbo -- n/a pistons, rods, crank, all of it??
I'm thinking then that I could assemble a n/a spec short block. Then if I need to use it for a turbo setup, I could deck the block and stick a turbo head on it...? Or do I have to deck the block before I put it all together?
Hmmmm... |
You need to deck the block before assembly but there's no reason why you can't use a pure NA bottom-end for a turbo engine.
Make sure you do your CR calcs accurately before decking the block.
Over here we can get away with 10.3:1CR with a NA engine on pump fuel. I'm not sure with U.S. pump fuel.
The critical measurement is the deck height but I would also double check the dish volume in the crown of the NA pistons.
Ideola is your friend:-
http://www.924board.org/viewtopic.php?t=37743
With stock ignition and fuel I'd keep CR no more than 10:1 NA and no more than 8:1 turbo. _________________ 1979 UK 932 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ideola

Joined: 01 Oct 2004 Posts: 15550 Location: Spring Lake MI
|
Posted: Sat Mar 21, 2015 11:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
All of the parts are interchangeable. The only differences I can think of are:
- Pistons
- Oil pickup mounting arrangement
- Block breather adapter
- Oil filter console on the 931, which attaches to the block with a banjo bolt, rather than the simple threaded adapter used on the NA block. Incidentally, I am looking for the latter, so if you're wanting a 931 oil filter console arrangement, maybe we could work a trade, as I have multiple spares of the latter, but none of the NA oil filter dealios.
I don't think there is any difference in how the oil pickup actually functions, but the 931 and the 81-onward NA had a multi-piece bracket rather than a welded-on bracket.
The block breathers are also different, but I don't know why. It's something of a moot point, however, because both parts are NLA. Whatever you do, don't throw away your old ones!
If you're using an NA crank, make sure you can get the NA-style pilot bearing out. The 931 uses a different setup (press fit roller bearing in the flywheel rather than needle bearings pressed into the end of the crank), and you'll need to get the NA pilot bearing out of the end of the crank, which can be a bear of a job.
One last thing to note: the 931 oil pan has the port for the turbo oil drain line, which the NA oil pan will lack. So if you want a turbo engine using OEM configuration, it would be best to have the 931 oil pan.
Also, don't forget, the flywheel / starter / clutch / bellhousing is all different on the 931, so you won't be able to (easily) use any NA stuff there. _________________ erstwhile owner of just about every 924 variant ever made |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
emoore924
Joined: 13 Apr 2004 Posts: 2822
|
Posted: Sat Mar 21, 2015 1:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | If you're using an NA crank, make sure you can get the NA-style pilot bearing out |
Hmmm, didn't know that. I thought they were all the same. I'll have to take a closer look at the crank I was considering.
Regarding a short block build-up, bottom line, it sounds like I can use the following essentially as-is:
Block
Rods
Crank (with the exception of the pilot bearing removal comment above)
Breather (I'm going to say either one will work )
Oil pump pickup (bracket is different)
Sounds like the following are not usable, at least not without significant modifications:
Pistons
Oil filter setup
Oil pan because of the oil return fitting
Did I miss anything? Any corrections? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MikeJinCO
Joined: 08 Jun 2010 Posts: 1246 Location: Maysville, Colorado
|
Posted: Sun Mar 22, 2015 12:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
I'm building what appears to be at this point a NA based on the 931 motor similar to Ideloa's. I didn't plan a copy, it just sort of evolved there. I just checked and the 931 crank has a hole in the end that looks like a pilot bearing would fit. I saw the drain back on the pan and thought wonderful, now I can but a catch tank on the blow by and drain in back to the pan for a carbed version. The large drain back fitting in the pan looks to be about 26mm with the same thread pitch as the FI injeciton port fittings so something should be around. I found th 22mm FI plugs on line from someplace in Canada-cheap so maybe time to digging again. There is another oil line in the back of the pan for-I have no idea what, but looks to be a fairly normal size. So making the pan work should be fairly doable.
From what I have read the problems with 931 pistons were with rings and piston ring lands breaking. Remember turbocharging was really pretty new back then, I worked for TRW pistons rings then and the best material we had was nodular iron with various coatings, they have undoubtedly changed by now to better materials particularly for turbocharged apps. I wouldn't waste money on stock aftermarket rings quality is typically so bad I'd buy Total Seal and their cost appears to be half that of getting both new pistons with rings and pins from JE or Diamond. _________________ Mike
'67 MG Midget Dp
'71 Ocelot Dsr Kawasaki 1000(under rebuild) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
leadfoot

Joined: 11 Dec 2002 Posts: 2222 Location: gOLD cOAST Australia
|
Posted: Sun Mar 22, 2015 12:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
there are two extra ports on the turbo oil pan,
turbo breather return port (side)
might be able to modify with a weld on AN bung and change the bottom fitting on the breather line...
purlator return (rear, above oil drain hole)
this can be drilled and tapped easily enough...
dipstick looks to be in the same position behind the steering wheel... or maybe that's just my car?
Stu _________________ 1981 ROW 924 Turbo -
carbon fiber GT mish mash
LS1 conversion in progress... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MikeJinCO
Joined: 08 Jun 2010 Posts: 1246 Location: Maysville, Colorado
|
Posted: Sun Mar 22, 2015 10:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I looked at my 931 crank and it has a hole in the end for a pilot bearing. Never having seen the 924 pilot bearing I can't verify that it is the correct size. I measured the fitting into the turbo breather port(side) and it was 25.8mm so I googled 26mm pipe plugs and found a 26mm x 1.5 Drain plug, and Audi PN 059-103-193 which is sold by Sherco-Auto PN DP8020, for about $15. I did not verify the thread pitch, The back port appears to be a 10mm thread or close.
So closing up the extra ports in the pan shouldn't be a great problem. I'm building a carbed motor so will make a drain back catch tank like the 931 has. _________________ Mike
'67 MG Midget Dp
'71 Ocelot Dsr Kawasaki 1000(under rebuild) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
leadfoot

Joined: 11 Dec 2002 Posts: 2222 Location: gOLD cOAST Australia
|
Posted: Mon Mar 23, 2015 12:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Here's what I measured on the pan... all 3 holes are 1.5 pitch
PCV return m14
turbo breather return 30mm
oil drain 26mm and here : http://fumoto.com.au/sizes.php
Stu _________________ 1981 ROW 924 Turbo -
carbon fiber GT mish mash
LS1 conversion in progress... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|