Show full size 924Board.org
Discussion Forum of 924.org
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
 Technical FAQ924 FAQ (Technical)   Technical924 Technical Section   Jump to 924.org924.org   Jump to PCA 924 Registry924 Registry

It's time for another Good idea! Bad Idea!

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    924Board.org Forum Index -> General Discussions
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
ThomasJoseph315  
Guest
PostPosted: Fri Aug 16, 2013 5:14 pm    Post subject: It's time for another Good idea! Bad Idea! Reply with quote
Removing this on a 924 NA (Non-turbo)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0dv38bt5zHs
Back to top
ThomasJoseph315  
Guest
PostPosted: Sun Aug 18, 2013 3:40 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
::crickets::
Back to top
sbarc  



Joined: 01 Feb 2010
Posts: 545
Location: West Coast of Canada
PostPosted: Sun Aug 18, 2013 5:15 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
so...is this a good idea or a bad idea?
_________________
1981 931 (Canadian car)
1981 931 (US car)
1990 928GT (ROW car)
1991 Toyota MR2
1989 Toyota MR2 Super Charged
1985 Toyota Supra
1973 Triumph GT6
1971 Opel GT
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Spliffy  



Joined: 23 Jun 2009
Posts: 50
Location: North Devon England
PostPosted: Sun Aug 18, 2013 9:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
Fail to see how it can be a bad idea, that throat is seriously restricted ! Do all US n/a have that ? cos my euro one sure didn't. Mind you it now has an Audi throttle body with even larger bores, and it does feel more lively.
_________________
1983 N/A
Turbo front brakes
Teledials
Audi T/B
Flush fit screen
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
924-76  



Joined: 05 Jun 2006
Posts: 1489
Location: Ontario, Canada
PostPosted: Mon Aug 19, 2013 1:04 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
Some info here in Intake / Throttle body:http://www.924board.org/viewtopic.php?p=218954#218954
_________________
1976 924 N/A ROW SOLD
1980 931S
1981 931 Part car RIP
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
ThomasJoseph315  
Guest
PostPosted: Mon Aug 19, 2013 3:11 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
I think originally thy put it in for emissions controls to bring the A/F ration down to reduce CO output. Maybe by removing and cranking it up we may get a quicker throttle responds... sigh,.. I dunno...

Anyone actually done this on an NA?

I am also thinking of getting that larger throttle body from the sciccero (?) and putting it on there.
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    924Board.org Forum Index -> General Discussions All times are GMT + 10 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group