Show full size 924Board.org
Discussion Forum of 924.org
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
 Technical FAQ924 FAQ (Technical)   Technical924 Technical Section   Jump to 924.org924.org   Jump to PCA 924 Registry924 Registry

Got a Shell? Suspension Geometry Question.

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    924Board.org Forum Index -> General Discussions
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Rasta Monsta  



Joined: 12 Jul 2006
Posts: 11733
Location: PacNW

PostPosted: Mon Jan 25, 2010 3:31 am    Post subject: Got a Shell? Suspension Geometry Question. Reply with quote

Need a quick question answered. . .

I neglected to take an important suspension measurement before removing it from the car, now I am trying to "make it up". . .My goal is to position the suspension on the floor as it would be when installed in the car, but unloaded. So, the assembly has to be properly "leveled" in relation to the floor. I am looking for a reference on the suspension that is level, or close to level, when installed in the car.

What I am eyeing now is the horizontal bolt that goes through the large bushing at the front of the t-bar mount. It looks parallel to the door sill. Is it? What about the flat end of the banana arm?
_________________
Toofah King Bad
  • WeiBe (1987 924S 2.5t) - 931 S3
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
ideola  



Joined: 01 Oct 2004
Posts: 15550
Location: Spring Lake MI

PostPosted: Mon Jan 25, 2010 9:10 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Unfortunately, both of the cars I have access to at the moment are not running stock ride height, so I can't help
_________________
erstwhile owner of just about every 924 variant ever made
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ic932  



Joined: 11 Feb 2005
Posts: 1104
Location: UK

PostPosted: Mon Jan 25, 2010 11:03 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Rasta, I use the banana arms as my North South axis and the tube for the East West axis. Obviously they need to be level at the same time. Just double check that both banana arms are giving the same reading.

Rig everything up so that the bars and springplates can be easily tested without disturbing the jig.

I use a cheap angle finder (as in pic) to determine the final springplate angle.

As a final test make sure the plates are level compared to the beam (see pic) Oh yeah, loosen the springplate eccentric for fine adjustment.




Obviously, this is just a mock-up to show you how I do it, I use small magnetic spirit levels on both banana arms and use steel shims to set the precise axis levels.

Dan, ride height is only a matter of the springplate angle. I think what Rasta is asking for is how to achieve setting up the springplate angle against a suitable known horizontal axis?

BTW, an angle of approx 18 deg on the stock 944 set-up I have illustrated. 23.5mm bars. Everything was pretty level but my angle reader is far from accurate but good enough to get even results for both plates. Comparing like with like....
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Rasta Monsta  



Joined: 12 Jul 2006
Posts: 11733
Location: PacNW

PostPosted: Tue Jan 26, 2010 2:07 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

IC, that is what I ended up doing. I set the assembly so the forward torsion mount bolt was level, and as it happened, the banana arm was level as well, as in your pic above. This week I get fasteners and spring plates zinced, and I may get the torsion carrrier powdercoated for rust protection, then it all goes back together.

ic932 wrote:
Dan, ride height is only a matter of the springplate angle. I think what Rasta is asking for is how to achieve setting up the springplate angle against a suitable known horizontal axis?

Yes!
_________________
Toofah King Bad
  • WeiBe (1987 924S 2.5t) - 931 S3
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
ideola  



Joined: 01 Oct 2004
Posts: 15550
Location: Spring Lake MI

PostPosted: Tue Jan 26, 2010 2:20 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Right, I understand that, but the technique I've heard of noting the angle as compared to the garage floor on a suspension in the car will only work if you're aiming for the same ride height and have the same torsion bars. Since the UWB has 30mm t-bars and is lowered to ~5", and since the 941 has been lowered to around 5.5", using either of them as a reference would not have worked for Rasta. I think.
_________________
erstwhile owner of just about every 924 variant ever made
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Rasta Monsta  



Joined: 12 Jul 2006
Posts: 11733
Location: PacNW

PostPosted: Tue Jan 26, 2010 2:31 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

You're still misunderstanding. . .I am using the "spreadsheet" technique, that relies on "loaded" and "unloaded" height of the t-bar carrier from the ground. The spreadsheet takes into account spring rate differences between different size t-bars, as well as any desired ride height change.

I ran into a problem when I forgot to measure "unloaded" height before pulling the suspension from the car, so I was trying to set the assembly up on the ground (wheels on) to get that measurement.
_________________
Toofah King Bad
  • WeiBe (1987 924S 2.5t) - 931 S3
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Fifty50Plus  



Joined: 28 Feb 2008
Posts: 1425
Location: Washington DC area

PostPosted: Tue Jan 26, 2010 2:38 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Rasta,
I've got an '82 tub riding on its suspension but otherwise no other parts still attached. Do you want me to take any measurments now that IC932 has given you a starting point?
Chuck
_________________
1979 924 NA race car H-Prod SCCA
1982 924 NA race car - Sold
1981 924 Turbo sold
1982 924 Turbo sold
1972 911 E race car - traded for Cayenne Diesel
1975 914 1.8 Building for H-Prod SCCA
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ideola  



Joined: 01 Oct 2004
Posts: 15550
Location: Spring Lake MI

PostPosted: Tue Jan 26, 2010 2:41 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Rasta Monsta wrote:
The spreadsheet takes into account spring rate differences between different size t-bars, as well as any desired ride height change.


I'm with you...I just didn't realize the spreadsheet took into account ride height change...it's been a long time since I looked at it...
_________________
erstwhile owner of just about every 924 variant ever made
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Rasta Monsta  



Joined: 12 Jul 2006
Posts: 11733
Location: PacNW

PostPosted: Tue Jan 26, 2010 2:43 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Chuck, thanks for the offer, but I already leveled it the best I could, took my unloaded height measurement, and stripped it.

We'll see how it looks back together. Hopefully I don't pull a Morghen and end up unable to get a jack underneath it. . .
_________________
Toofah King Bad
  • WeiBe (1987 924S 2.5t) - 931 S3
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Rasta Monsta  



Joined: 12 Jul 2006
Posts: 11733
Location: PacNW

PostPosted: Tue Jan 26, 2010 2:53 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

For future thread searchers, the SPREADSHEET MENTIONED IS HERE.
_________________
Toofah King Bad
  • WeiBe (1987 924S 2.5t) - 931 S3
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    924Board.org Forum Index -> General Discussions All times are GMT + 10 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group