Show full size 924Board.org
Discussion Forum of 924.org
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
 Technical FAQ924 FAQ (Technical)   Technical924 Technical Section   Jump to 924.org924.org   Jump to PCA 924 Registry924 Registry

Chevy volt "whole new design"
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    924Board.org Forum Index -> General Discussions
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Rocco R16V  



Joined: 03 May 2009
Posts: 497
Location: PNW

PostPosted: Mon Aug 17, 2009 6:14 am    Post subject: Chevy volt "whole new design" Reply with quote

So i'm listening to talk radio and they are talking about the Chevy volt and they say; it's not like the prius, its a whole new design where the motor doesnt drive the wheels it charges the battery.
I had to laugh as most car people know this design isnt new.
Then last night I was doing a search on here and came across this (thanks Smothie)
http://www.autohistory.org/feature_6.html

So GovMotors is claiming that the volt gets like 230 million mpg(230 mpg) and the radio guys did their due diligence and found it gets only 35mpg highway.
They did say “if you drive less than 40 miles per day and charge it overnight that you could drive forever without filling up” again I laugh and think no, not even close. Assuming the batteries last ten years and don’t ever decade (yeah right) I get only 146000 before having to buy batteries. Its such a joke!

So What do you think, are there any inventors anymore, is this $40K+ car going to save GM and us?
_________________
"Government exists to protect us from each other. Where government has gone beyond its limits is in deciding to protect us from ourselves. "
Ronald Reagan
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
D Hook  



Joined: 02 Nov 2002
Posts: 3158
Location: Omaha, NE

PostPosted: Mon Aug 17, 2009 6:31 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

40k is pretty a stiff price.
_________________
'80 924 n/a SOLD
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Joes924Racer  



Joined: 03 Nov 2002
Posts: 11964
Location: Oregon, Denver Colorado native!

PostPosted: Mon Aug 17, 2009 6:31 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

hey maybe they can send it over to porsche..
I went to the movies last night and saw district 9, it
was amazing. Has sequal written all over the place.
Party on guys.
_________________
1979 porsche 924 Na
1980 porsche Turbo 931GT Replica
Have u ever driven a turbo.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address
D Hook  



Joined: 02 Nov 2002
Posts: 3158
Location: Omaha, NE

PostPosted: Mon Aug 17, 2009 6:38 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Joes924Racer wrote:
hey maybe they can send it over to porsche..
I went to the movies last night and saw district 9, it
was amazing. Has sequal written all over the place.
Party on guys.


Segue whiplash.
_________________
'80 924 n/a SOLD
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
macBdog  



Joined: 16 Aug 2004
Posts: 1111
Location: Brisbane, Australia

PostPosted: Mon Aug 17, 2009 10:14 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

District 9 is unreal!
_________________
1979 931 with a 350 chev
1973 911E with EFI
p-talk wrote:
I'm still convinced the word 'Porsche' makes people crazy in all kinds of ways
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Paul  



Joined: 02 Nov 2002
Posts: 9491
Location: Southeast Wisconsin

PostPosted: Mon Aug 17, 2009 10:53 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I wonder if it will go 40 miles on just the battery in the winter with headlights, front and rear defoggers, windshield wipers, and the radio all on for the whole trip.
_________________
White 87 924S "Ghost"
Silver 98 986 3.6l 320 HP "Frank N Stein"
White 01 986 "Christine"
Polar Silver 02 996TT. "Turbo"
Owned and repaired 924s since 1977
Porsche: It's not driving, it's therapy.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Chrenan  



Joined: 15 Jan 2003
Posts: 3903
Location: Canada

PostPosted: Mon Aug 17, 2009 12:06 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

GM and Chrysler won't be seeing any of my business until they pay back their government loans. They stole enough of my tax payment already. If they made a car that ran on air I still wouldn't buy it.
_________________
1987 951 - M193 Version for Japan
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Joes924Racer  



Joined: 03 Nov 2002
Posts: 11964
Location: Oregon, Denver Colorado native!

PostPosted: Mon Aug 17, 2009 12:34 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

My step dad was talking about this car tonight he thinks its great as in the claim of 230 mpg.. hell probly get one when and if they ever do. Its just a matter of time.. its pretty neat though not good enough a start.
_________________
1979 porsche 924 Na
1980 porsche Turbo 931GT Replica
Have u ever driven a turbo.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address
PORSCHEV  



Joined: 02 Nov 2002
Posts: 1901
Location: Cedar Lake Nova Scotia, Canada

PostPosted: Mon Aug 17, 2009 9:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

D Hook wrote:
40k is pretty a stiff price.


Yes..but the Government is going to give you 10,000.00 credit/rebate for buying one.
_________________
1976 924
5 lug conversion, 17'C2 wheels,custom body work,327 vette engine.

1978-#53 "D" track racer.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
datatrain  



Joined: 15 Sep 2007
Posts: 441
Location: Osoyoos, British Columbia

PostPosted: Tue Aug 18, 2009 5:41 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

So who will be willing to pop $40K for an untried vehicle. Toyota's Prius has been on the road for a few years now and most taxis I see are Prius.
At about $25K. If you've been in one they are amazing.

Why would you spend your hard earned bucks for a GovtMotors car ? Even GM admits they will be subsidizing the buyers for a couple of years. Hardly sounds like a well thought out business plan to me.

It would be easier for GM to just buy Toyota. Oh I forget, the US Govt would need to borrow all the money to do that since they are the largest shareholders and they are broke as well.

In about 2 years this entire bailout scenario will be replayed but from an even weaker position. They should have been left for the market to determine their fate. After all, that's supposedly how capitalism works. No one ever offered to bail my business out.
_________________
'78 924 NA with Collector plate
33 year old car, with me for 21 yrs
Mint '92 318i BMW
Near mint '98 Buick LeSabre
VE7HFR
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Rocco R16V  



Joined: 03 May 2009
Posts: 497
Location: PNW

PostPosted: Tue Aug 18, 2009 3:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Paul wrote:
I wonder if it will go 40 miles on just the battery in the winter with headlights, front and rear defoggers, windshield wipers, and the radio all on for the whole trip.

or in the hot summer with the ac on?

datatrain wrote:
prius.. If you've been in one they are amazing.

I hate 'em a '77 honda civic, ‘92 civic, and others, get better gas mileage, don’t have all the batteries and can actually climb a long hill without slowing way down once they run out of bat power, yes this happens, I’ve seen it. They are hideous and spew huge amounts of SMUG!
datatrain wrote:
They should have been left for the market to determine their fate. After all, that's supposedly how capitalism works. No one ever offered to bail my business out.

I agree we (us taxpayers) should not be paying to bailout anyone.

Actually I think for a city commuter car the volt is the right idea, but then again a golf cart achieves the same goal at a much lower price and there are some street legal versions avail. But who will buy em, Californians, who already have the least extra power grid capacity to recharge them. And coal is still the #1 source for power, so the no pollution statement is a farce.
_________________
"Government exists to protect us from each other. Where government has gone beyond its limits is in deciding to protect us from ourselves. "
Ronald Reagan
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Chrenan  



Joined: 15 Jan 2003
Posts: 3903
Location: Canada

PostPosted: Tue Aug 18, 2009 11:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Rocco R16V wrote:
And coal is still the #1 source for power, so the no pollution statement is a farce.


Its even worse than that. The raw material for the batteries is mined near Sudbury in central Canada. Then the heavy raw material is shipped to Scandanavia where the battery packs are made. The heavy battery packs are then shipped to Japan (or the US, not sure if they make the Pious outside of Japan), then the complete car is shipped to the sale destination. Making a Pious has a huge negative environmental impact compared to a normal car.

The whole "Hybrid" concept is a complete joke, clean Diesel cars in Europe get much better mileage. My first car, a 1980 Toyota Tercel got much better mileage.
_________________
1987 951 - M193 Version for Japan
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
!tom  



Joined: 28 Aug 2006
Posts: 1941
Location: Victoria, BC Canada

PostPosted: Wed Aug 19, 2009 2:14 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Chrenan wrote:
The heavy battery packs are then shipped to Japan (or the US, not sure if they make the Pious outside of Japan)


My understanding is that the only Prious assembly plant is within Japan.
_________________
78 924 NA
5-lug
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Rattlinbone  



Joined: 21 Jun 2009
Posts: 265
Location: Seattle, WA

PostPosted: Wed Aug 19, 2009 12:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Why would I want to drive a GM car? I have a Porsche!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
POORscheMAN  



Joined: 08 Sep 2003
Posts: 104
Location: Norwich NY

PostPosted: Thu Aug 20, 2009 4:00 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

American car manufacturers need to get their act together and take a lesson from ze Germans.

My 1994 968 in its current trim is producing roughly 250hp from a 3.0l 4 cyl engine. I drove around 300 miles this past weekend and am getting around 27-28 mpg.
My 99 Chevy half ton with a 5.7L makes the same power at half the efficiency.

Porsche created variocam and an N/A intake that crates 4psi of boost from pulse tuning in 1992 (968 Resonant induction intake).

Why cant an American Car company in 2009 make a car that gets 40+mpg but produces healthy hp numbers (220+hp)
_________________
1978 924
Audi 5K Throttle Body - 10:1 comp
Stage 1 Cam -MSD coil- Crane XR700 ignition - Headers
260# springs -26mm rear TBars-
poly bushings -Weltmeister sway bars

1980 924 N/A -- stock
1982 931
1988 944
1994 968 M030
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    924Board.org Forum Index -> General Discussions All times are GMT + 10 Hours
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group