Show full size 924Board.org
Discussion Forum of 924.org
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
 Technical FAQ924 FAQ (Technical)   Technical924 Technical Section   Jump to 924.org924.org   Jump to PCA 924 Registry924 Registry

New member/ Engine Question

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    924Board.org Forum Index -> 924S Discussions
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
JohnRichard  



Joined: 10 May 2009
Posts: 5
Location: London, KY

PostPosted: Thu May 14, 2009 1:57 pm    Post subject: New member/ Engine Question Reply with quote

Greetings!

I just bought a 924s from a friend of mine. I have been reading all I can about it, and the differences from the other Porsche's I am a little more familiar with.

While I am waiting on a new fuel pump to get here, I decided to go ahead and see what kind of engine mods I can get out of the way, since its torn down any way.

I would like to stay n/a with this car, and wanted to know how much abuse the bottom end will take. I would like to up the redline, and upgrade the top end, but if the bottom isn't up to the task, then there is no point. I am going to get a mild street/weekend track cam.

Any thoughts? Sorry if this doens't make any sense... I'm really tired.
_________________
'87 942S -
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
gohim  



Joined: 02 Nov 2002
Posts: 4459
Location: Rialto, CA

PostPosted: Thu May 14, 2009 5:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

There is very little you can do inexpensively to gain HP from the 2.5L engine.

However, you could switch to higher compression pistons from a 88 924S or 944 (.5 point) or a 944S (1 point higher). This will mean that you would probably need to modify or update the ECU to prevent detonation.

You could also have have the crank drilled to oil the rod bearings, as these engine have a tendency to starve the #2 rod bearing, and destroy them.

Another way to go would be to replace the 2.5L engine with a 2.7 from a 89 944, or a 3.0L engine.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Rasta Monsta  



Joined: 12 Jul 2006
Posts: 11733
Location: PacNW

PostPosted: Fri May 15, 2009 3:23 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Or an LS1. Renegade Hybrids has a very highly developed kit that costs under $3k, and the all-alumninum LS1 motors can be had used from around $1500.

Or, you could blow $15k to get similar power from a 2.5. Just make sure your Triple A is up to date!
_________________
Toofah King Bad
  • WeiBe (1987 924S 2.5t) - 931 S3
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
JohnRichard  



Joined: 10 May 2009
Posts: 5
Location: London, KY

PostPosted: Sat May 16, 2009 7:15 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
Or an LS1.


Not going to comment on that.

Upgrading the pistons is more my style, as I was planning on going full standalone anyhow. Will I have to modify the piston for valve clearance?

On a side note, can I do the BIG VALVE mod myself?
_________________
'87 942S -
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
ideola  



Joined: 01 Oct 2004
Posts: 15550
Location: Spring Lake MI

PostPosted: Sat May 16, 2009 9:33 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

JohnRichard wrote:
Quote:
Or an LS1.


Not going to comment on that.

Upgrading the pistons is more my style, as I was planning on going full standalone anyhow. Will I have to modify the piston for valve clearance?

On a side note, can I do the BIG VALVE mod myself?

The so-called big valve mod is specific to the 2.0L platform, which is a completely different powerplant than the 2.5L that is in your 924S. Gohim pretty much nailed your options. Spend beaucoup bucks on a 2.5L race engine (take a look here or here) or upgrade to a 2.7L or 3.0L.

Since you've ruled out forced induction I won't tempt you with the Speedforce Racing bolt-on supercharger. Whoops. Did I type that out loud
_________________
erstwhile owner of just about every 924 variant ever made
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
gohim  



Joined: 02 Nov 2002
Posts: 4459
Location: Rialto, CA

PostPosted: Sat May 16, 2009 4:48 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Higher compression pistons tops are already cut.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Rasta Monsta  



Joined: 12 Jul 2006
Posts: 11733
Location: PacNW

PostPosted: Sun May 17, 2009 1:22 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

JohnRichard wrote:
Not going to comment on that.


Hmm, you don't like one of the world's most reliable, efficient, and highly developed all-aluminum V8s? Nice and light too, not much heavier than the 2.5. . .
_________________
Toofah King Bad
  • WeiBe (1987 924S 2.5t) - 931 S3
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
John Brown  



Joined: 07 Nov 2002
Posts: 903
Location: Leesburg VA

PostPosted: Mon May 18, 2009 4:19 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The fellows have covered all the directions. Choose according to your personal philosophy. Some thoughts.

You mentioned a cam. The stock cam timing is very conservative and so a new cam is a good place to improve over stock.

The 'high compression' pistons from late 2.5L if sourced at a reasonable price are a good idea assuming as you say the motor is torn down anyway. I wouldn't pull it apart just for these pistons. Lately though it seems I see these things at silly prices. Keep in mind that replacing pistons should probably - though not absolutely - require new rings and honing the bores. Once you spend all that it makes no sense (to me) to pay $500 for a set of used pistons (plus rings) when a complete 'custom' piston with rings is about $1100. At, say, $200 or less it seems attractive (to me).

Upping the rpm of course is a time-honored hot rod move. Keep in mind this is an inline 4 which even with balance shafts still vibrates. Which is why both the 2.7 and especially 3.0 motors had more problems than the 2.5. The 3.0 especially had internal failures notably with oil pickups even driven only and sedately on the street. What with the work involved I am not a fan of converting from a 2.5 to either 2.7 or 3.0. Heck, if you are going to go that route why not just do the LS1!!!

Drilling the number 2 rod journal can't hurt. I recommend only drilling the #2. That's the one that needs the oil the most. You can do it yourself but will need a VERY good drill. The elves did a VERY good job hardening the journals. The crank will require balancing. The Porsche cranks are nicely balanced as is but the drilling is enough to ruin that.

It is just barely possible to install slightly larger valves. But you run right out to the edge of the valve seat inserts and smack into shrouding from the cylinder walls. The cam is a better place to spend money. BTW, the oem valves and valve seats are high quality. With any luck no matter how much mileage you can spiffy up whatever is in it now.
_________________
John
80 931 - #931 44Cup
99 Escalade - tows track cars
gone but not forgotten: original 924.org car - 82
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
ic932  



Joined: 11 Feb 2005
Posts: 1104
Location: UK

PostPosted: Mon May 18, 2009 5:40 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

John Brown wrote:
The 'high compression' pistons from late 2.5L if sourced at a reasonable price are a good idea assuming as you say the motor is torn down anyway. I wouldn't pull it apart just for these pistons. Lately though it seems I see these things at silly prices. Keep in mind that replacing pistons should probably - though not absolutely - require new rings and honing the bores. Once you spend all that it makes no sense (to me) to pay $500 for a set of used pistons (plus rings) when a complete 'custom' piston with rings is about $1100. At, say, $200 or less it seems attractive (to me).


Remember that these blocks are Alusil and a specific process is needed to prepare the bores. You can't just use any aftermarket pistons and rings without checking for compatability with the Alusil block.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
JohnRichard  



Joined: 10 May 2009
Posts: 5
Location: London, KY

PostPosted: Tue May 19, 2009 7:51 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

After much reading, I am seriously thinking about going the Turbo + Megasquirt route. I already am planning to do the MS system, and I can scrap the ITB setup for a nice large single throttle body and a good sized small turbo (say 10 - 12 psi boost?).

I'm still going to get the cam!
_________________
'87 942S -
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    924Board.org Forum Index -> 924S Discussions All times are GMT + 10 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group