Show full size 924Board.org
Discussion Forum of 924.org
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
 Technical FAQ924 FAQ (Technical)   Technical924 Technical Section   Jump to 924.org924.org   Jump to PCA 924 Registry924 Registry

Stainless steel valves source for 924 and 931
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    924Board.org Forum Index -> Performance Upgrades
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Raceboy  



Joined: 01 Mar 2004
Posts: 2327
Location: Estonia, Europe

PostPosted: Fri Dec 19, 2008 12:53 am    Post subject: Stainless steel valves source for 924 and 931 Reply with quote

Is here:

931:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/NEW-Stainless-Steel-valves-Porsche-924-Turbo-1980-82_W0QQcmdZViewItemQQcategoryZ33621QQihZ002QQitemZ120269105490QQtcZphoto

924:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/NEW-Stainless-Steel-valves-Porsche-924-Non-T-1976-82_W0QQcmdZViewItemQQcategoryZ33621QQihZ002QQitemZ120269105318QQtcZphoto

I've used 931 items on customers race-car and stainless valves on my 2.5 16v engine are also from the same source. IMO price is very good and so is quality according to my machinist.
This seller carries valves for a LOT of cars. No affiliation.
_________________
'83 924 2.6 16v Turbo, 470hp
'67 911 2.4S hotrod
'90 944 S2 Cabriolet
'78 924 Carrera GT replica
'84 928 S, sold
'91 944 S2, sold
'82 924S/931 "Gulf", sold
'84 924, turbocharged, sold.
http://www.facebook.com/vemsporsche
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
Rasta Monsta  



Joined: 12 Jul 2006
Posts: 11733
Location: PacNW

PostPosted: Fri Dec 19, 2008 1:59 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Interesting. . .I see this post being assimilated into Dan's uberthread.
_________________
Toofah King Bad
  • WeiBe (1987 924S 2.5t) - 931 S3
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
ideola  



Joined: 01 Oct 2004
Posts: 15550
Location: Spring Lake MI

PostPosted: Fri Dec 19, 2008 3:08 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Rasta Monsta wrote:
Interesting. . .I see this post being assimilated into Dan's uberthread.

I've been watching these guys for several weeks now...but probably not going this route for the UWB, as my build calls for smaller valve stems than stock specs. At this time, I'm still planning to work thru European Motorworks, although more recently I've been entertaining the notion of working with one of a handful of local shops.
_________________
erstwhile owner of just about every 924 variant ever made
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Raceboy  



Joined: 01 Mar 2004
Posts: 2327
Location: Estonia, Europe

PostPosted: Fri Dec 19, 2008 4:03 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Those are good replacements for stocks as they are decent price and readily available.

I've been looking for bigger valves for my 931 "Gulf", also with 7mm or 8mm stems but main concern is the length. 931 valve is 133 mm long and not that many cars use such long valves, especially with 7mm or 8mm stems.

I'm considering doing just intakes as I don't see point in upping the exaust valves on 931 (already 36mm).
44-45mm intake valves seem to be good choice when exaust is left stock size.
Of course, I'd prefer using exaust valves with 7mm stems also. Not a necessity though.
_________________
'83 924 2.6 16v Turbo, 470hp
'67 911 2.4S hotrod
'90 944 S2 Cabriolet
'78 924 Carrera GT replica
'84 928 S, sold
'91 944 S2, sold
'82 924S/931 "Gulf", sold
'84 924, turbocharged, sold.
http://www.facebook.com/vemsporsche
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
Rasta Monsta  



Joined: 12 Jul 2006
Posts: 11733
Location: PacNW

PostPosted: Sat Dec 20, 2008 4:21 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

So, aside from pricing, what are the advantages of these over stock units?
_________________
Toofah King Bad
  • WeiBe (1987 924S 2.5t) - 931 S3
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Raceboy  



Joined: 01 Mar 2004
Posts: 2327
Location: Estonia, Europe

PostPosted: Sat Dec 20, 2008 4:22 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Better build quality and material, even compared to sodium-filled exaust valves of 931.
_________________
'83 924 2.6 16v Turbo, 470hp
'67 911 2.4S hotrod
'90 944 S2 Cabriolet
'78 924 Carrera GT replica
'84 928 S, sold
'91 944 S2, sold
'82 924S/931 "Gulf", sold
'84 924, turbocharged, sold.
http://www.facebook.com/vemsporsche
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
Min  



Joined: 04 Nov 2002
Posts: 2368
Location: Vernon, British Columbia, Canada

PostPosted: Sat Dec 20, 2008 6:12 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I got my stainless valves from EBS for less money.

Min
_________________
Custom means it didn't come from a box.
1980 n/a with EDIS and Megasquirt II Injection. 7 different colors and counting.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
Rasta Monsta  



Joined: 12 Jul 2006
Posts: 11733
Location: PacNW

PostPosted: Sat Dec 20, 2008 7:42 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hmm, I searched around a bit, and found a few opinions that sodium-filled has better cooling than SS. . .
_________________
Toofah King Bad
  • WeiBe (1987 924S 2.5t) - 931 S3
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Martijnus  



Joined: 29 Dec 2006
Posts: 2019
Location: Netherlands

PostPosted: Sat Dec 20, 2008 8:45 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Rasta Monsta wrote:
Hmm, I searched around a bit, and found a few opinions that sodium-filled has better cooling than SS. . .


that's the reason the sodium is in them...

what's the advantage of 'stainless'?

Don't they bend on an interference engine when the drivetrain fails? No, and if so, something else dies.
Are they lighter? No, iirc stainless steel is heavier than normal stuff...
Do they conduct heat better? Dunno..

Still don't see the advantage... stock ones aren't stainless?
_________________
"Rule: Turbo's make torque, and torque makes fun." (C. Bell)

924 "50-jahre", 1981.
MSII/extra, LPG, ITB's, 5lug.
To be turbo'ed in a while.
Killed her at the Nurburgring, Porscheless at the moment
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger
Raceboy  



Joined: 01 Mar 2004
Posts: 2327
Location: Estonia, Europe

PostPosted: Sun Dec 21, 2008 1:51 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Stock ones aren't stainless and I weighed both of them, stock ones are also a bit heavier.

Stainless valves withstand heat much better and retain good seal between valve seat and valve longer.


Of course they bend when they meet with pistons.
_________________
'83 924 2.6 16v Turbo, 470hp
'67 911 2.4S hotrod
'90 944 S2 Cabriolet
'78 924 Carrera GT replica
'84 928 S, sold
'91 944 S2, sold
'82 924S/931 "Gulf", sold
'84 924, turbocharged, sold.
http://www.facebook.com/vemsporsche
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
Martijnus  



Joined: 29 Dec 2006
Posts: 2019
Location: Netherlands

PostPosted: Sun Dec 21, 2008 4:55 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Raceboy wrote:
Stock ones aren't stainless and I weighed both of them, stock ones are also a bit heavier.

Stainless valves withstand heat much better and retain good seal between valve seat and valve longer.


Of course they bend when they meet with pistons.


could be because I'm in the rebuilding branche, but the valves don't have that much impact on the seal. Most of the time it's the valve seat which is the problem when the seal is bad. When the seat is bad, the valve itself will follow too...

That they withstand heat better is a nice advantage, especially when you're running LPG (what my goal is...).

I don't get why porsche used sodium filled valves, which are more expensive and harder to make, when stainless steel is (if I get it right) better regarding heat conduction.
Or did they invent stainless steel in the early nineties?

price isn't bad as far as I can see.
_________________
"Rule: Turbo's make torque, and torque makes fun." (C. Bell)

924 "50-jahre", 1981.
MSII/extra, LPG, ITB's, 5lug.
To be turbo'ed in a while.
Killed her at the Nurburgring, Porscheless at the moment
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger
Rasta Monsta  



Joined: 12 Jul 2006
Posts: 11733
Location: PacNW

PostPosted: Sun Dec 21, 2008 5:37 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Porsche used sodium filled exhaust valves to aid in cooling and extend valve life (931, 911, 914). The sodium carries heat away from the valve head and into the stem.

The new Z06 engine has them as well.
_________________
Toofah King Bad
  • WeiBe (1987 924S 2.5t) - 931 S3
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Martijnus  



Joined: 29 Dec 2006
Posts: 2019
Location: Netherlands

PostPosted: Sun Dec 21, 2008 10:39 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

to quote raceboy:

Quote:

Better build quality and material, even compared to sodium-filled exaust valves of 931.


So why don't they just put in stainless instead of sodium filled?
I assume they had that alternative in those days...

I conclude that the stainless ones won't concuct heat better than the sodium filled... right or wrong?
_________________
"Rule: Turbo's make torque, and torque makes fun." (C. Bell)

924 "50-jahre", 1981.
MSII/extra, LPG, ITB's, 5lug.
To be turbo'ed in a while.
Killed her at the Nurburgring, Porscheless at the moment
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger
Raceboy  



Joined: 01 Mar 2004
Posts: 2327
Location: Estonia, Europe

PostPosted: Sun Dec 21, 2008 5:14 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

This is never-ending debate.

The reason why OEM's don't use stainless valves is cost. It's cheaper to produce usual valve and fill with sodium than stainless. Even though they sell it to us for high price. And mostly they don't bother even filling the ex. valve with sodium.

I'm not it the mood for arguing (almost never am), just use whatever you like.
_________________
'83 924 2.6 16v Turbo, 470hp
'67 911 2.4S hotrod
'90 944 S2 Cabriolet
'78 924 Carrera GT replica
'84 928 S, sold
'91 944 S2, sold
'82 924S/931 "Gulf", sold
'84 924, turbocharged, sold.
http://www.facebook.com/vemsporsche
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
Rasta Monsta  



Joined: 12 Jul 2006
Posts: 11733
Location: PacNW

PostPosted: Mon Dec 22, 2008 6:30 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Well, based my my reading, sodium filled valves have better heat management. If it were a question of cost, you couldn't buy 8 SS valves for the cost of two sodium filled exhaust valves. It also seems unlikely that GM would skimp on their max effort ZR1 motor. . .if SS was best, I think it would have been used.

I certainly respect your experience with these engines. I also like fully exploring decisions I am on the threshhold of making for myself, and the way I do that is listening to opinions and gathering evidence.

I see it as "argument" in the classical, knowledge-seeking or rhetorical sense, not the personal or hostile sense.

But, if you want to check out of the discussion, feel free.


_________________
Toofah King Bad
  • WeiBe (1987 924S 2.5t) - 931 S3
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    924Board.org Forum Index -> Performance Upgrades All times are GMT + 10 Hours
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group