 |
924Board.org Discussion Forum of 924.org
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Raceboy

Joined: 01 Mar 2004 Posts: 2327 Location: Estonia, Europe
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Rasta Monsta

Joined: 12 Jul 2006 Posts: 11733 Location: PacNW
|
Posted: Fri Dec 19, 2008 1:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
Interesting. . .I see this post being assimilated into Dan's uberthread. _________________ Toofah King Bad
- WeiBe (1987 924S 2.5t) - 931 S3
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ideola

Joined: 01 Oct 2004 Posts: 15550 Location: Spring Lake MI
|
Posted: Fri Dec 19, 2008 3:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Rasta Monsta wrote: | | Interesting. . .I see this post being assimilated into Dan's uberthread. |
I've been watching these guys for several weeks now...but probably not going this route for the UWB, as my build calls for smaller valve stems than stock specs. At this time, I'm still planning to work thru European Motorworks, although more recently I've been entertaining the notion of working with one of a handful of local shops. _________________ erstwhile owner of just about every 924 variant ever made |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Raceboy

Joined: 01 Mar 2004 Posts: 2327 Location: Estonia, Europe
|
Posted: Fri Dec 19, 2008 4:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
Those are good replacements for stocks as they are decent price and readily available.
I've been looking for bigger valves for my 931 "Gulf", also with 7mm or 8mm stems but main concern is the length. 931 valve is 133 mm long and not that many cars use such long valves, especially with 7mm or 8mm stems.
I'm considering doing just intakes as I don't see point in upping the exaust valves on 931 (already 36mm).
44-45mm intake valves seem to be good choice when exaust is left stock size.
Of course, I'd prefer using exaust valves with 7mm stems also. Not a necessity though. _________________ '83 924 2.6 16v Turbo, 470hp
'67 911 2.4S hotrod
'90 944 S2 Cabriolet
'78 924 Carrera GT replica
'84 928 S, sold
'91 944 S2, sold
'82 924S/931 "Gulf", sold
'84 924, turbocharged, sold.
http://www.facebook.com/vemsporsche |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Rasta Monsta

Joined: 12 Jul 2006 Posts: 11733 Location: PacNW
|
Posted: Sat Dec 20, 2008 4:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
So, aside from pricing, what are the advantages of these over stock units? _________________ Toofah King Bad
- WeiBe (1987 924S 2.5t) - 931 S3
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Raceboy

Joined: 01 Mar 2004 Posts: 2327 Location: Estonia, Europe
|
Posted: Sat Dec 20, 2008 4:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
Better build quality and material, even compared to sodium-filled exaust valves of 931. _________________ '83 924 2.6 16v Turbo, 470hp
'67 911 2.4S hotrod
'90 944 S2 Cabriolet
'78 924 Carrera GT replica
'84 928 S, sold
'91 944 S2, sold
'82 924S/931 "Gulf", sold
'84 924, turbocharged, sold.
http://www.facebook.com/vemsporsche |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Min

Joined: 04 Nov 2002 Posts: 2368 Location: Vernon, British Columbia, Canada
|
Posted: Sat Dec 20, 2008 6:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
I got my stainless valves from EBS for less money.
Min _________________ Custom means it didn't come from a box.
1980 n/a with EDIS and Megasquirt II Injection. 7 different colors and counting. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Rasta Monsta

Joined: 12 Jul 2006 Posts: 11733 Location: PacNW
|
Posted: Sat Dec 20, 2008 7:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hmm, I searched around a bit, and found a few opinions that sodium-filled has better cooling than SS. . . _________________ Toofah King Bad
- WeiBe (1987 924S 2.5t) - 931 S3
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Martijnus

Joined: 29 Dec 2006 Posts: 2019 Location: Netherlands
|
Posted: Sat Dec 20, 2008 8:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Rasta Monsta wrote: | | Hmm, I searched around a bit, and found a few opinions that sodium-filled has better cooling than SS. . . |
that's the reason the sodium is in them...
what's the advantage of 'stainless'?
Don't they bend on an interference engine when the drivetrain fails? No, and if so, something else dies.
Are they lighter? No, iirc stainless steel is heavier than normal stuff...
Do they conduct heat better? Dunno..
Still don't see the advantage... stock ones aren't stainless? _________________ "Rule: Turbo's make torque, and torque makes fun." (C. Bell)
924 "50-jahre", 1981.
MSII/extra, LPG, ITB's, 5lug.
To be turbo'ed in a while.
Killed her at the Nurburgring, Porscheless at the moment |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Raceboy

Joined: 01 Mar 2004 Posts: 2327 Location: Estonia, Europe
|
Posted: Sun Dec 21, 2008 1:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
Stock ones aren't stainless and I weighed both of them, stock ones are also a bit heavier.
Stainless valves withstand heat much better and retain good seal between valve seat and valve longer.
Of course they bend when they meet with pistons. _________________ '83 924 2.6 16v Turbo, 470hp
'67 911 2.4S hotrod
'90 944 S2 Cabriolet
'78 924 Carrera GT replica
'84 928 S, sold
'91 944 S2, sold
'82 924S/931 "Gulf", sold
'84 924, turbocharged, sold.
http://www.facebook.com/vemsporsche |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Martijnus

Joined: 29 Dec 2006 Posts: 2019 Location: Netherlands
|
Posted: Sun Dec 21, 2008 4:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Raceboy wrote: | Stock ones aren't stainless and I weighed both of them, stock ones are also a bit heavier.
Stainless valves withstand heat much better and retain good seal between valve seat and valve longer.
Of course they bend when they meet with pistons. |
could be because I'm in the rebuilding branche, but the valves don't have that much impact on the seal. Most of the time it's the valve seat which is the problem when the seal is bad. When the seat is bad, the valve itself will follow too...
That they withstand heat better is a nice advantage, especially when you're running LPG (what my goal is...).
I don't get why porsche used sodium filled valves, which are more expensive and harder to make, when stainless steel is (if I get it right) better regarding heat conduction.
Or did they invent stainless steel in the early nineties?
price isn't bad as far as I can see. _________________ "Rule: Turbo's make torque, and torque makes fun." (C. Bell)
924 "50-jahre", 1981.
MSII/extra, LPG, ITB's, 5lug.
To be turbo'ed in a while.
Killed her at the Nurburgring, Porscheless at the moment |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Rasta Monsta

Joined: 12 Jul 2006 Posts: 11733 Location: PacNW
|
Posted: Sun Dec 21, 2008 5:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
Porsche used sodium filled exhaust valves to aid in cooling and extend valve life (931, 911, 914). The sodium carries heat away from the valve head and into the stem.
The new Z06 engine has them as well. _________________ Toofah King Bad
- WeiBe (1987 924S 2.5t) - 931 S3
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Martijnus

Joined: 29 Dec 2006 Posts: 2019 Location: Netherlands
|
Posted: Sun Dec 21, 2008 10:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
to quote raceboy:
| Quote: |
Better build quality and material, even compared to sodium-filled exaust valves of 931.
|
So why don't they just put in stainless instead of sodium filled?
I assume they had that alternative in those days...
I conclude that the stainless ones won't concuct heat better than the sodium filled... right or wrong? _________________ "Rule: Turbo's make torque, and torque makes fun." (C. Bell)
924 "50-jahre", 1981.
MSII/extra, LPG, ITB's, 5lug.
To be turbo'ed in a while.
Killed her at the Nurburgring, Porscheless at the moment |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Raceboy

Joined: 01 Mar 2004 Posts: 2327 Location: Estonia, Europe
|
Posted: Sun Dec 21, 2008 5:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
This is never-ending debate.
The reason why OEM's don't use stainless valves is cost. It's cheaper to produce usual valve and fill with sodium than stainless. Even though they sell it to us for high price. And mostly they don't bother even filling the ex. valve with sodium.
I'm not it the mood for arguing (almost never am), just use whatever you like. _________________ '83 924 2.6 16v Turbo, 470hp
'67 911 2.4S hotrod
'90 944 S2 Cabriolet
'78 924 Carrera GT replica
'84 928 S, sold
'91 944 S2, sold
'82 924S/931 "Gulf", sold
'84 924, turbocharged, sold.
http://www.facebook.com/vemsporsche |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Rasta Monsta

Joined: 12 Jul 2006 Posts: 11733 Location: PacNW
|
Posted: Mon Dec 22, 2008 6:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
Well, based my my reading, sodium filled valves have better heat management. If it were a question of cost, you couldn't buy 8 SS valves for the cost of two sodium filled exhaust valves. It also seems unlikely that GM would skimp on their max effort ZR1 motor. . .if SS was best, I think it would have been used.
I certainly respect your experience with these engines. I also like fully exploring decisions I am on the threshhold of making for myself, and the way I do that is listening to opinions and gathering evidence.
I see it as "argument" in the classical, knowledge-seeking or rhetorical sense, not the personal or hostile sense.
But, if you want to check out of the discussion, feel free.
 _________________ Toofah King Bad
- WeiBe (1987 924S 2.5t) - 931 S3
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|