Show full size 924Board.org
Discussion Forum of 924.org
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
 Technical FAQ924 FAQ (Technical)   Technical924 Technical Section   Jump to 924.org924.org   Jump to PCA 924 Registry924 Registry

Timing Advance?? and 2008 update

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    924Board.org Forum Index -> Performance Upgrades
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
PORSCHEV  



Joined: 02 Nov 2002
Posts: 1901
Location: Cedar Lake Nova Scotia, Canada

PostPosted: Fri Jun 06, 2008 10:13 pm    Post subject: Timing Advance?? and 2008 update Reply with quote

I am running the euro pistons with 9.3:1 CR as well as a piper cam. I can't recall the specs ATM for the cam. I may have to email andrew in NZ for them.

I just installed the cam yesterday and I set the timing at 12 degrees advance. The car seems to pull ok after 3000 rpms. I ran the car 50 laps or so with a stock cam with 10 degrees advance prior to installing the cam to get a feel of how the engine would feel.The cam didn't make a huge difference compared to the pistons and refreshed engine.

It amazing how much work you have to put into your car to make it fractionally faster!! I estimate that I am running 25 more hp and 35 more ft of torque. I also have 15" goodyear slicks with an 8" footprint that really grab the track. I worked with the car on set-up to the point I can take turns 3-4 at 90 km and let go of the wheel and the car will take the corner by itself

Last year the car at best ran a lap time of 20.6. This year I am just breaking into the 19.9 range. SO....thats alot of time and money for 7/10th!!!

My local track is going through some major growing pains where the 4 cyl modified class has folded due to lack of cars. I had the option of going back down to the 4 stock class where the cry and whine that my car is unfair even tho it's meets the rule criteria. I also had the option of running with the 6 cyl modified class. They mostly run sportsman chassis with a mild modified engine. So rather then slowing down I opted to take on the big boys. The best lap time I have seen in that class has been a 19.5..so I am not too far off the pace. Bit nervous running a 2000 lb car with 3000lb cars......but what the hell!

Almost forgot. The best mod I made for the car was the GT nose panel where I made duct work to the rad from the 4 upper openings. I ran the car HARD for 20 laps and last year I would be running 3/4 on the temp gauge..this year I can't get it off the 1/4 mark!! Awsome improvement!
_________________
1976 924
5 lug conversion, 17'C2 wheels,custom body work,327 vette engine.

1978-#53 "D" track racer.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
RC  



Joined: 25 Mar 2007
Posts: 2637
Location: Australia

PostPosted: Fri Jun 06, 2008 11:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Good effort really Porschev.
7/10th second is a definite improvement and will cover a lot of track in that time. But yea, its expensive and more difficult to gain those extra 1/10ths.

Unsure what fuel your`e running but in my experience you could run over 15 initial safely on 95 or higher with a Euro dizzy. Especially with a longer duration cam timing advance will yield much improvement. Conservatively try advancing a few degrees at a time until the onset of pinging (on a hot engine and even with slightly lower octane fuel) then back off a few degrees.

Best of luck this season.

Roger
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
PORSCHEV  



Joined: 02 Nov 2002
Posts: 1901
Location: Cedar Lake Nova Scotia, Canada

PostPosted: Sat Jun 07, 2008 2:20 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

That was my next question. I am running the north American version of the dizzy. Do I need to swap in the euro to the get the proper advance curve?
_________________
1976 924
5 lug conversion, 17'C2 wheels,custom body work,327 vette engine.

1978-#53 "D" track racer.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
RC  



Joined: 25 Mar 2007
Posts: 2637
Location: Australia

PostPosted: Sat Jun 07, 2008 10:04 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

PORSCHEV wrote:
That was my next question. I am running the north American version of the dizzy. Do I need to swap in the euro to the get the proper advance curve?


No, looking at the various CENTRIFUGAL advance curves it isnt necessary.
Since this is solely your racer there is no reason to run any vacuum advance or retard either. Vac advance is purely a economy measure that comes in during part throttle cruise conditions, or throttling off, when vac is high, or actually the MAP is low. Expect your`e at full throttle most of the time when MAP will be close to atmospheric, ie no vacuum. During gear changes or any periods of foot off the throttle the vacuum actuator will move your pick up plate accordingly. Although relatively quick, say 200ms, this variation is not ideal in a race car where your`e counting those 1/10ths.

Now the US dizzy also has vac retard for emissions purposes. Expect you are even less concerned about emissions as you are fuel economy. Yea, no place for that in a racer. So in short, remove both the vacuum lines and plug them.

Assume you have the 77-79 110Hp dizzy which has 28 (crank) deg advance at 5200 RPM. IMO the advance is too tapered, too slow. Optimum TOTAL advance will be around 44 deg, this is what you should aim for. So set the dizzy at 16 initial + 28 adv = 44 total. Suggest marking additional lines on the flywheel (various colors help) to 45 - 50 deg. IIRC 10 deg is around 2 1/2 teeth so index them from that. Easy to check now revving in neutral with a timing light.

Looking at the charts in haynes the early US 76-77, 95Hp dizzy would be comparable with the Euro IMO, running only mechanical advance of course. The advance comes on much steeper, around 35 deg at 3800. Initial will be around 9 deg to give 44 total. With the euro having 26adv at 3500rpm an initial setting of around 18 should be in the ballpark.

You will find generally that earlier advance to the point of maximum torque is best. This is around 3500RPM with a stock cam but with yours 3800 would likely be more suitable even possibly up to the 5200RPM the likely current dizzy provides. Depends primarily on the cam youre running. Use the highest octane fuel available and do some realistic experimentation checking total maximum advance with whatever dizzy you run.

Roger
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
PORSCHEV  



Joined: 02 Nov 2002
Posts: 1901
Location: Cedar Lake Nova Scotia, Canada

PostPosted: Sat Jun 07, 2008 11:24 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Man do I owe you a cold beer for that response! Well written! I will do exactly what you said and let you know the results.
_________________
1976 924
5 lug conversion, 17'C2 wheels,custom body work,327 vette engine.

1978-#53 "D" track racer.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
endwrench  



Joined: 07 Dec 2002
Posts: 1631
Location: Victor, Montana

PostPosted: Sun Jun 08, 2008 2:34 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Great response by RC! I would only ask if your RPM ever falls below 4600? The ROW 110HP curve isn't all in till that point and the Euro unit is all in by 3500rpm. And for some reason, according to the graphs in Haynes, the ROW units taper off about 2° at 6500rpm after peaking at 4600rpm. The Euro units do not do this. Not a big deal but if your looking for every advantage.....

Todd
_________________
'79 924NA. Rebuilt 9.5:1, MSDS header, Mega Squirt Injection, MJLJ-EDIS Ignition, 1.6L Whipple Charger and Intercooler, 10lbs Boost, 944 Trans, Custom HD Clutch.
"simsport" said....superchargers are better than turbos its official!....
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
PORSCHEV  



Joined: 02 Nov 2002
Posts: 1901
Location: Cedar Lake Nova Scotia, Canada

PostPosted: Sun Jun 08, 2008 8:53 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I set the timing at idle to 16 degrees advance and then spun it up to 3500 rpm...I found the total advance at that rpm was 33-35. This makes more sense now with what your saying endwrench.

I do need the rpm's below 4500..lol When I exit corners 1-2 I am around 34-3600 rpm. Down the back stretch I peak out at 6200+.

It will have to be what it is for today...it's the first race day of the season
_________________
1976 924
5 lug conversion, 17'C2 wheels,custom body work,327 vette engine.

1978-#53 "D" track racer.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
RC  



Joined: 25 Mar 2007
Posts: 2637
Location: Australia

PostPosted: Mon Jun 09, 2008 6:29 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Well how did you go?
Hope ya kicked ass

Just had another look at those advance tables while posting my EFI settings in another thread. Endwrench is right with the 4600 RPM for max adv on the 110Hp dizzy. Think I must have counted 200 RPM per square to get 5200. Anyway even at 4600 it comes in too late, even for a hot cam. IIRC Piper only have 1 924 grind that is "fast street, or rally", not super hot.

Unsure why the US dizzys retard that 2 deg after the peak. Possibly as a fudge factor against the CIS leaning out with lower fuel? emissions?

So if youre after those 1/10ths look around for a Euro dizzy, or go programmable. Could likely go with a little more advance on the current dizzy but check it at > 4600 as its still climbing at 3500.

Roger
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
PORSCHEV  



Joined: 02 Nov 2002
Posts: 1901
Location: Cedar Lake Nova Scotia, Canada

PostPosted: Tue Jun 10, 2008 11:13 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Well the timing couldn't have been to bang on for me race day. My class got thrown in with the stock 4's again this year and they were pulling along and some were out pulling me on the starts. NOT COOL.

The car was alot faster in the corners but that was all to do with set-up and great tires. I didn't take any checkers this week, but that was due to the fact they started the modified cars behind the street class and made us work our way through the field...but you can't pass when they are 4 wide!

Back to the power issue I am starting to think I should really look at having the injectors serviced since they didn't have the best spray pattern last I checked and going over the ignition.

During the feature race I was running strong out front when the right front hub of the rotor decided to shatter. Luckily I felt it go "funny" and pitted right away. I wonder if there are any better then stock versions out there?
_________________
1976 924
5 lug conversion, 17'C2 wheels,custom body work,327 vette engine.

1978-#53 "D" track racer.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
Rasta Monsta  



Joined: 12 Jul 2006
Posts: 11733
Location: PacNW

PostPosted: Tue Jun 10, 2008 1:11 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I know I have seen an aftermarket hub online, I just couldn't find it. The ad says, "Don't let a failed hub ruin your race weekend. SCCA legal."

I'll check back if I turn up the site. . .it was for a 944.
_________________
Toofah King Bad
  • WeiBe (1987 924S 2.5t) - 931 S3
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
924RACR  



Joined: 29 Jul 2001
Posts: 9066
Location: Royal Oak, MI, USA

PostPosted: Tue Jun 10, 2008 10:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

RC's dead-nuts on. We run ours with 42deg total advance, no vacuum connections at all (centrifugal only). Tried pinning them once, didn't work. 9.5:1 CR with 93 octane pump gas, and a 4 deg cam key. In our case, this works out to about 12 deg base timing at idle (stock US distributors).

I highly recommend actually checking it revving the engine up to speed; your advance may not be performing as you expect, and you'd hate to find out the hard way by blowing a motor.

I've seen that hub too. Not SCCA legal across the board, but a good replacement. OTOH, I've never had any issue with stock hubs, yours must've been bad. Magnaflux is the best way to go...

HTH...
_________________
Vaughan Scott
Webmeister
'79 924 #77 SCCA H Prod racecar
'82 931 Plat. Silver
#25 Hidari Firefly P2 sports prototype
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    924Board.org Forum Index -> Performance Upgrades All times are GMT + 10 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group