| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
der uber

Joined: 23 Feb 2007 Posts: 18 Location: Louisville, KY
|
Posted: Wed Mar 14, 2007 6:55 am Post subject: Power loss under hard accelleration |
|
|
Would a very small vacuum leak become more noticable under hard accelleration?
Sometimes when I push around 3500-4000rpm I get a small but noticeable power loss but everything fires. Seems like the fuel cuts back some. But it otherwise rides great - it is just when I "get on it." and doesn't always do it.
Everything I have read so far is all about vacuum.
I plan to replace the fuel filter once the part arrives, since it woudn't hurt to replace that anyway.
PO rebuilt the car with a non turbo motor. There is nothing else special or upgraded about the engine or other areas of the vehicle. _________________ 1980 931 converted to n/a
My first project |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Rasta Monsta

Joined: 12 Jul 2006 Posts: 11733 Location: PacNW
|
Posted: Wed Mar 14, 2007 6:59 am Post subject: Re: Power loss under hard accelleration |
|
|
| der uber wrote: | | Would a very small vacuum leak become more noticable under hard accelleration? |
No. _________________ Toofah King Bad
- WeiBe (1987 924S 2.5t) - 931 S3
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ozzie

Joined: 12 Mar 2005 Posts: 4448 Location: Townsville, Qld. Australia
|
Posted: Wed Mar 14, 2007 7:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
Check your timing and your distributor.
My vacuum advance diaphragm was shot and a spring was off the centrifugal advance- making both incorrect or inoperative.
Ended up replacing the whole lot. _________________ Porsche 924 1984 (UK import) NA
Its AUTO and its BLACK
Montego Black on black/red
Engineer of Electro/Mechanical Systems Maintenance |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Rasta Monsta

Joined: 12 Jul 2006 Posts: 11733 Location: PacNW
|
Posted: Wed Mar 14, 2007 7:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
Here's a cheap dist on Ebay. . . _________________ Toofah King Bad
- WeiBe (1987 924S 2.5t) - 931 S3
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bruce76-924

Joined: 22 Feb 2007 Posts: 105 Location: Bradford, England
|
Posted: Wed Mar 14, 2007 7:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
Double check your ignition leads, my old car had a power drop under hard acceleration and I traced it to bad leads. You can see if they are arcing out if you look at them in the dark, if they are bad you get pretty sparks dancing around the engine bay!! _________________ 1976 924 LHD, full cage, semi tube chassis, 951 brakes, lightweight 951 body panels.
1.8t engine conversion with Holset turbo and 6 speed Audi gearbox. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
der uber

Joined: 23 Feb 2007 Posts: 18 Location: Louisville, KY
|
Posted: Wed Mar 14, 2007 8:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
Awesome - I will check those areas out. _________________ 1980 931 converted to n/a
My first project |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
gohim
Joined: 02 Nov 2002 Posts: 4459 Location: Rialto, CA
|
Posted: Wed Mar 14, 2007 8:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
A small vacuum leak would not become more evident at 3500-4000rpm.
An pressurize intake or an exhaust leak would. You could have a broken or missing fastener/s in the pressurized track between the turbo output and cylinder head, OR an exhaust leak between the cylinder head, and turbo.
It is very common for the 931s to lose fasteners in the turbo piping, and leak pressure, causing a loss of hp. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Rasta Monsta

Joined: 12 Jul 2006 Posts: 11733 Location: PacNW
|
Posted: Wed Mar 14, 2007 1:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Gohim, its a 931 converted to N/A.
(*thud*) <- gohim fainting _________________ Toofah King Bad
- WeiBe (1987 924S 2.5t) - 931 S3
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
gohim
Joined: 02 Nov 2002 Posts: 4459 Location: Rialto, CA
|
Posted: Wed Mar 14, 2007 2:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
thud is right....
why does he still call it a turbo? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
der uber

Joined: 23 Feb 2007 Posts: 18 Location: Louisville, KY
|
Posted: Wed Mar 14, 2007 7:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I still call it a turbo because I'm literally an idiot about this. I ask sincerely and humbly... what would you recommend as my description.
Should Turbo not even be in there at all?
| Quote: | | 931 converted to N/A. |
Is that the appropriate desc.? I want this to be right or else instead of getting advice people focus on what a dumbass I appear to be.
Thank you in advance. _________________ 1980 931 converted to n/a
My first project |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
D Hook

Joined: 02 Nov 2002 Posts: 3158 Location: Omaha, NE
|
Posted: Wed Mar 14, 2007 9:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'd love to see pics of the engine and see how he did the that.
Is the fuel distributor still on the passenger side? (LHD)
I'd look hard at the distributor. Sounds like that might be the culprit. _________________ '80 924 n/a SOLD |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
der uber

Joined: 23 Feb 2007 Posts: 18 Location: Louisville, KY
|
Posted: Wed Mar 14, 2007 9:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Sounds like some real consensus on the distributor. I will post pics asap, this evening at the earliest. I'm thinking of doing an animated gif of the engine and exterior, a la ideola. _________________ 1980 931 converted to n/a
My first project |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
!tom

Joined: 28 Aug 2006 Posts: 1941 Location: Victoria, BC Canada
|
Posted: Thu Mar 15, 2007 3:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
Sounds like fuel filter to me.
A couple months ago, mine was running fine, except it would sometimes have a bit of a miss when cold right after starting. I figured that was due to a weak spark, so I replaced the cap and rotor. That fixed the miss when cold problem, but then it ran like crap over 3000 RPM. It was being starved of fuel, so I replaced the fuel filter, and everything was great. It had more power than before.
I figured the weaker spark from the bad cap and rotor was preventing it from producing enough power to demand more fuel than the filter could flow. Replacing the cap and rotor gave it a hotter spark, so it was now able to demand more power than the old filter could flow, resulting in fuel starvation.
At least that's what I've convinced myself. _________________ 78 924 NA
5-lug |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|