| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Disco Stew
Joined: 24 Oct 2003 Posts: 43 Location: Yorkshire, England
|
Posted: Sat Apr 08, 2006 7:05 am Post subject: Turbo or S? |
|
|
| Looks like I might have to sell my Beetle cabrio so might get another 924. I previously had an n/a 2.0 litre but would like something quicker. Which would make the better daily driver, an S or a turbo? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
J1NX3D

Joined: 06 Feb 2003 Posts: 1333 Location: New Zealand
|
Posted: Sat Apr 08, 2006 9:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
id say an S imho. _________________ '86 944 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Paul

Joined: 02 Nov 2002 Posts: 9491 Location: Southeast Wisconsin
|
Posted: Sat Apr 08, 2006 9:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
I have both, get an S if you want a daily driver. _________________ White 87 924S "Ghost"
Silver 98 986 3.6l 320 HP "Frank N Stein"
White 01 986 "Christine"
Polar Silver 02 996TT. "Turbo"
Owned and repaired 924s since 1977
Porsche: It's not driving, it's therapy. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
StienbargerR
Joined: 28 Oct 2005 Posts: 1362 Location: Richmond, IN
|
Posted: Sat Apr 08, 2006 9:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
a 924 S would be a better DD, because there is less to go wrong in them.
Ryan _________________ 1978 924 NA
-250lb lowering springs, Euro Pistons |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
J1NX3D

Joined: 06 Feb 2003 Posts: 1333 Location: New Zealand
|
Posted: Sat Apr 08, 2006 10:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
a turbo adds complications, it is 24 to27 yrs old, parts are harder to find, theyre pretty cheap for a crap one, not straight forward to get power out of but do-able.
the S is 18-20yrs old, they have their own issues but are generally more reliable, parts are more plentiful because of 944's. Aftermarket parts are more plentiful, more expensive to get power from. _________________ '86 944 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
CBass

Joined: 03 Nov 2002 Posts: 2807 Location: Vancouver, Canada
|
Posted: Sat Apr 08, 2006 11:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
Agreed with everyone said.
If you want to build something fast for not excessively expensive, 924 turbo is the way to go.
If you want a nice daily driver, 924 S is the way to go. You can get it to handle just about as well as you want, more aftermarket for the S since it uses 944 bits, etc. Power is harder to get than with a 931 of course, but really how much power do you need? _________________ '81 931 in various states of assembly |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
seanski44

Joined: 13 Mar 2006 Posts: 532 Location: Nottingham UK
|
Posted: Sat Apr 08, 2006 9:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hi, agree with all said, working on the turbo can be a pain, while a good S with a nice engine will be fairly straightforward. (he said!)
Also aim for a the latest model S you can buy as the last model year 88? (at least in the UK) had the same power as the 944 2.5, and yet was cheaper and lighter... (they derestricted it in the last year as the 944 got an upgrade to 2.7 I believe, and previously they hadn't wanted the 924 to have the same amount of power as the more expensive 944)
happy shopping
p.s. as people have kind of suggested, the 924S is more expensive than a turbo, though its a buyers' market! _________________ 1998 BMW Z3 2.8 arctic silver & red
1981 168HP 931 S2 blue/tan leather - SOLD
1985 121HP 924 2.0l na modded - SOLD!
1992 968 lux SOLD
1989 944 2.7 lux SOLD |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Disco Stew
Joined: 24 Oct 2003 Posts: 43 Location: Yorkshire, England
|
Posted: Sat Apr 08, 2006 9:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Good advice, thanks. An 'S' it is then! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
924er

Joined: 10 Jan 2006 Posts: 339 Location: Los Angeles California
|
Posted: Sun Apr 09, 2006 10:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
S ! _________________ 80' Porsche 924 NA - Slower then a S L O W
86' Porsche 951- New toy |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|