Show full size 924Board.org
Discussion Forum of 924.org
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
 Technical FAQ924 FAQ (Technical)   Technical924 Technical Section   Jump to 924.org924.org   Jump to PCA 924 Registry924 Registry

Intake Design

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    924Board.org Forum Index -> 931 Tech.
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
bass gt  



Joined: 02 Dec 2004
Posts: 971
Location: Johannesburg for now!!

PostPosted: Thu Feb 16, 2006 10:47 am    Post subject: Intake Design Reply with quote

Guy's,

I have read with interest Nicks post from a while ago regarding designing a new intake for the 931. The talk moved on to a diffusor design being an ideal choice. However, these seemed to be based upon a single throttle body.
As you know, i am fitting ITB's, so my question is whether a diffusor type plenum is still advantageous, or a standard taper type single chamber plenum is a better option.
As i have made the plenum back plate, now is the time to decide!

Cheers,

Steve
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Lizard  



Joined: 03 Nov 2002
Posts: 9364
Location: Abbotsford BC. Canada

PostPosted: Thu Feb 16, 2006 12:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

you can still have the intake plenum after the ITBs and it will make a difference, but what type of power are you looking for?
_________________
3 928s,
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
endwrench  



Joined: 07 Dec 2002
Posts: 1631
Location: Victor, Montana

PostPosted: Thu Feb 16, 2006 1:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The point of the diffuser is to distribute the incoming air to the plenum more evenly so I would "assume" it would serve the same purpose with ITB's. I'm not sure if it is worth the extra effort or not. Audi sure seems to think so!

Todd
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
sequential  



Joined: 18 Nov 2005
Posts: 500
Location: BANNED

PostPosted: Thu Feb 16, 2006 1:32 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The diffusor setup as used by Audi , will take some doing to get right , the idea is to reduce turbulence and promote induction speed , it is not about just distribution. the installation of the trumpets is key as you do not want to crowd them. it will kill flow quickly. make sure the ends and edges are as clear as you can .5 inch off the floor is good and a airbox volume of 1.5-1.7 times engine displacement. remember to extend 1-1.5 inch behind number 4 cyl. ( take your map sensor reading from the back here) remember min3 inchs above the trumpet and i prefer to taper ( as per pic )
_________________
928 gts prototype
baby blue engine block
steam in 1,2,3,4 sometimes
cold star issues while on stands
112 whp with new 4 valve head and MIS 2
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Raceboy  



Joined: 01 Mar 2004
Posts: 2327
Location: Estonia, Europe

PostPosted: Thu Feb 16, 2006 4:49 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'm in a progress of fabricating two intakes (one for my 931, other for my friends 951 3.0 turbo engine) and I'm doing it the diffusor-way. Right now I've cut some pieces and the trumpets are being fabricated in a shop (full-radius types).
Just for fun, here's intake of Carrera GT (not 924 though):
http://forums.rennlist.com/rennforums/attachment.php?attachmentid=99372&stc=1
_________________
'83 924 2.6 16v Turbo, 470hp
'67 911 2.4S hotrod
'90 944 S2 Cabriolet
'78 924 Carrera GT replica
'84 928 S, sold
'91 944 S2, sold
'82 924S/931 "Gulf", sold
'84 924, turbocharged, sold.
http://www.facebook.com/vemsporsche
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
Peter_in_AU  



Joined: 29 Jul 2001
Posts: 2743
Location: Sydney, Australia

PostPosted: Thu Feb 16, 2006 6:36 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

sequential wrote:
... make sure the ends and edges are as clear as you can .5 inch off the floor is good ... remember min3 inchs above the trumpet and i prefer to taper ( as per pic )


sequential, this goes against what I have seen of bellmouth smoke tests. On a smoke test where you can see how the air is drawn into a bellmouth the bulk of the air drawn is from a horizontal and a below-horizontal direction. This was backed up by a test I saw in a mag that showed that a cone with a rolled tip (a bellmouth) outflowed a cone with no lip. That test showed that airflow increased rapidly as the roll increased towards 30 degrees below horizontal and then the gains were minimal after that.

Based on that I would have thought that the more volume under the bellmouth opening the better.

Of course the tests I have read did not have the air being sucked in at anything like the speed that air moves inside an intake so they might not be valid in the real world.

I'd love to know before my real life begins and I have time to experiment with this stuff.
_________________
1979 924 (Gone to a better place)
1974 Lotus 7 S4 "Big Valve" Twin-cam (waiting)
1982 924 (As featured on Wikipedia)

Learn to love your multimeter and may the search be with you
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
sequential  



Joined: 18 Nov 2005
Posts: 500
Location: BANNED

PostPosted: Thu Feb 16, 2006 6:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

hello guy,s,

I not sure what you are getting at peter, Yes the most important part of the trumpet is the corners , curl , bell, span , etc that is what i said and mean't by suggesting a min of .5 inch of course 1-2 inch is better if there is room. as there is no flow in the center of the bell. also you do not want anything within 3 inchs in front of the bell.

steve when flow bench testing the head , place a finger on one of edges of the trumpets and you will see a drop in flow then put 3 fingers towards the center and you will see no drop in flow.
_________________
928 gts prototype
baby blue engine block
steam in 1,2,3,4 sometimes
cold star issues while on stands
112 whp with new 4 valve head and MIS 2
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bass gt  



Joined: 02 Dec 2004
Posts: 971
Location: Johannesburg for now!!

PostPosted: Thu Feb 16, 2006 7:10 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Guy's,

here are my TB's. I am thinking of a uniform chamber, with a tapered pipe running along the whole length on the top or side, into which a slot is made to link the two chambers. The tapered pipe will be the air feed from the I/C.
Regarding the trumpets, is there a minimum clearance they require on all sides?

Steve


Last edited by bass gt on Sat Mar 18, 2006 8:35 pm; edited 4 times in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Peter_in_AU  



Joined: 29 Jul 2001
Posts: 2743
Location: Sydney, Australia

PostPosted: Thu Feb 16, 2006 8:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

sequential wrote:
I not sure what you are getting at peter...


Why leave 3 inches of space above the trumpet rim when the bulk of the air is coming from below or horizontal to the trumpet rim?
_________________
1979 924 (Gone to a better place)
1974 Lotus 7 S4 "Big Valve" Twin-cam (waiting)
1982 924 (As featured on Wikipedia)

Learn to love your multimeter and may the search be with you
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
My924gtc  



Joined: 14 Aug 2004
Posts: 1362
Location: 248

PostPosted: Thu Feb 16, 2006 11:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I do believe he was refering to the space in front of the trumpet needing to be 3 in. minimum. "above' might have been the wrong term.

I'm doing the same type of intake for my ITB set up, and all the afore mentioned principles are sound. Don't know about going after the throttle bodies as per lizard's post as it seems like it would kill velocity but I'm no expert.

As it is, I have a tappered plenum housing 4 stacks running directly into the ITB's and then tappered runners going into the head. I think this design should make for excellent velocity as it enters the head and the length of the runners is optimized for the best atomization of the fuel in the charge.

I'm also developing a single throttle body set up with injectors in the runners but that will be going on my 931 later this year.
_________________
MJ
'81 924 2.0L T
'82 924 2.3L SC/EFI <---online fall '06

Sponsor of the 944 Cup and Super Cup
Sponsor of the "2006 Battle in the Badlands"
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
sequential  



Joined: 18 Nov 2005
Posts: 500
Location: BANNED

PostPosted: Fri Feb 17, 2006 3:04 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Peter_in_AU wrote:
sequential wrote:
I not sure what you are getting at peter...


Why leave 3 inches of space above the trumpet rim when the bulk of the air is coming from below or horizontal to the trumpet rim?


Turbulence matey!
_________________
928 gts prototype
baby blue engine block
steam in 1,2,3,4 sometimes
cold star issues while on stands
112 whp with new 4 valve head and MIS 2
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
sequential  



Joined: 18 Nov 2005
Posts: 500
Location: BANNED

PostPosted: Fri Feb 17, 2006 3:09 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

bass gt wrote:
[img]http://public.fotki.com/BassGT/931/103_0395.html[/img]

Guy's,

here are my TB's. I am thinking of a uniform chamber, with a tapered pipe running along the whole length on the top or side, into which a slot is made to link the two chambers. The tapered pipe will be the air feed from the I/C.
Regarding the trumpets, is there a minimum clearance they require on all sides?

Steve

Ahhh, Yes the slot ! how big will this slot be ? ahh i thought so, when you are finished Steve , I would love to see the flow numbers for comparision's sake's,
_________________
928 gts prototype
baby blue engine block
steam in 1,2,3,4 sometimes
cold star issues while on stands
112 whp with new 4 valve head and MIS 2
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Raceboy  



Joined: 01 Mar 2004
Posts: 2327
Location: Estonia, Europe

PostPosted: Fri Feb 17, 2006 4:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The slot must be in the area of 30 mm wide (bit more than 1 inch).
_________________
'83 924 2.6 16v Turbo, 470hp
'67 911 2.4S hotrod
'90 944 S2 Cabriolet
'78 924 Carrera GT replica
'84 928 S, sold
'91 944 S2, sold
'82 924S/931 "Gulf", sold
'84 924, turbocharged, sold.
http://www.facebook.com/vemsporsche
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    924Board.org Forum Index -> 931 Tech. All times are GMT + 10 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group