| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
emoore924
Joined: 13 Apr 2004 Posts: 2822
|
Posted: Wed Nov 23, 2011 2:35 pm Post subject: Anyone running Hoosier 225/45/15 on 7x15's? |
|
|
Need to know whether these tires would work, front and rear, on 7x15 cookies with rolled fenders.
If yes, are you running coilovers or spacers? What about lowering springs or torsions in the rear?
Thanks! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
924RACR

Joined: 29 Jul 2001 Posts: 9075 Location: Royal Oak, MI, USA
|
Posted: Wed Nov 23, 2011 10:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
We did, but the fronts needed a bit of flaring as well as rolling.
With the late-offset PD's, no rolling needed.
Coilovers (2.5" springs) up front, t-bars only in the rear.
Now we're required to run 6" wide rims (per class rules), so stock 924 15x6" rims. _________________ Vaughan Scott
Webmeister
'79 924 #77 SCCA H Prod racecar
'82 931 Plat. Silver
#25 Hidari Firefly P2 sports prototype |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
emoore924
Joined: 13 Apr 2004 Posts: 2822
|
Posted: Thu Nov 24, 2011 9:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks. I have access to low heat-cycle hoosiers from some of the 944 cup guys and they're running the 45's. Was hoping to take advantage of that but it looks like maybe not because I'd have to run 7x15s....
Back to the 6x15s  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
924RACR

Joined: 29 Jul 2001 Posts: 9075 Location: Royal Oak, MI, USA
|
Posted: Thu Nov 24, 2011 11:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Perhaps I should clarify.
We are now required (in ITB) to run no wider than 6" rims, so we run the 15x6's.
I didn't say we stopped running 225/45/15's.
We continue to run the 225s; it's just a little more work to get the 225's on. More work for the tire guy, that is.
Go for those cheap takeoffs. _________________ Vaughan Scott
Webmeister
'79 924 #77 SCCA H Prod racecar
'82 931 Plat. Silver
#25 Hidari Firefly P2 sports prototype |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
emoore924
Joined: 13 Apr 2004 Posts: 2822
|
Posted: Sat Nov 26, 2011 7:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
Ho! You're running the 45s on 6" rims? I've run 225/50s on 6" for years but not 45s. How's the contact patch look? What pressures are you running?
I ass-umed that 6" wouldn't work because of what hoosier says about minimum rim width...
Tell me more... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
924RACR

Joined: 29 Jul 2001 Posts: 9075 Location: Royal Oak, MI, USA
|
Posted: Sat Nov 26, 2011 11:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
They're fast. This is the config in which I've set both Mid-O lap records, won the Waterford Championship, and various other such things.
Standard drill, target hot pressure is 39.5 psi. Cold pressures, YMMV, depends on ambient and how hard you push, could be anywhere from 28-32psi.
We of course picked the size, in part, because of the plentiful takeoff supply. _________________ Vaughan Scott
Webmeister
'79 924 #77 SCCA H Prod racecar
'82 931 Plat. Silver
#25 Hidari Firefly P2 sports prototype |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
emoore924
Joined: 13 Apr 2004 Posts: 2822
|
Posted: Sun Nov 27, 2011 4:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
Schweet. See ya at the track  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Fifty50Plus

Joined: 28 Feb 2008 Posts: 1422 Location: Washington DC area
|
Posted: Wed Nov 30, 2011 2:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
I was running the 225X50X15 HoHos on both the Benz and 911 (7 inch rims) for a few years. Has a bit of a rear fender issue on the 911. Switched to the 45s on both cars. Both are now 1/2 inch lower to the ground and the wheel revs/mile has gone up a bit (better acceleration). It also slightly changes your effective spring rate. I like them and as Vaughan said, I will put them on the 924 on 6 inch rims. _________________ 1979 924 NA race car H-Prod SCCA
1982 924 NA race car - Sold
1981 924 Turbo sold
1982 924 Turbo sold
1972 911 E race car - traded for Cayenne Diesel
1975 914 1.8 Building for H-Prod SCCA |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
emoore924
Joined: 13 Apr 2004 Posts: 2822
|
Posted: Wed Nov 30, 2011 3:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
Ja, I've been running 225/50's for years. The thing that had me concerned was Hoosier says "no narrower than 7" rims" for the 45's. I gonna say experience trumps their guidance however
I'm hoping for all the benefits/changes you mention (gearing, lowering, spring rate...) and see little on the downside.
Still two concerns however which I guess I'll have resolve for myself:
1) Rubbing somewhere, which is fixable IMHO. The 50s *just* touch in the front under hard cornering (45s will have lower profile so that might solve itself...) The fenders are already rolled/flared but the car is lowered, but i might have to go with coilovers in the front and remove the spacer in the rear to clear. Gonna load up some koni sports and that might help some too as that should reduce the suspension movement a bit...
...and the other concern is having the sidewall tucked in so much that it compromises either tire sidewall strength or the flatness (size) of the contact patch against the ground...I'll just have to see what happens there and perhaps manipulate the pressures after taking tire temps -- that'll tell me straightaway what's going on with the contact patch... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
924RACR

Joined: 29 Jul 2001 Posts: 9075 Location: Royal Oak, MI, USA
|
Posted: Wed Nov 30, 2011 5:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
We actually use doubled-up stock rear wheel spacers on the rear, and singles on the front (bored out to fit the front hub).
Sounds like you need more suspension stiffness/less roll...
EDIT: here's a pic of the front:
 _________________ Vaughan Scott
Webmeister
'79 924 #77 SCCA H Prod racecar
'82 931 Plat. Silver
#25 Hidari Firefly P2 sports prototype |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
emoore924
Joined: 13 Apr 2004 Posts: 2822
|
Posted: Wed Nov 30, 2011 12:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| What wheels are you using tho? You're moving things out pretty far. I thought you'd mentioned at one time you were using late phonies. I have like a million cookies..., and stock length wheel studs I think. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Fifty50Plus

Joined: 28 Feb 2008 Posts: 1422 Location: Washington DC area
|
Posted: Wed Nov 30, 2011 1:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
A million cookies....Yum _________________ 1979 924 NA race car H-Prod SCCA
1982 924 NA race car - Sold
1981 924 Turbo sold
1982 924 Turbo sold
1972 911 E race car - traded for Cayenne Diesel
1975 914 1.8 Building for H-Prod SCCA |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
924RACR

Joined: 29 Jul 2001 Posts: 9075 Location: Royal Oak, MI, USA
|
Posted: Wed Nov 30, 2011 10:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
LOL!
No, we run 6's, remember? These are stock 924 5-lug 15x6 spiderwebs.
As you can see, yes, we did have to fit longer wheel studs. _________________ Vaughan Scott
Webmeister
'79 924 #77 SCCA H Prod racecar
'82 931 Plat. Silver
#25 Hidari Firefly P2 sports prototype |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SoyRacer
Joined: 25 May 2003 Posts: 156 Location: Long Island, New York
|
Posted: Sun Dec 25, 2011 10:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
Okay... I have run Hoosier 225-45s on 15x7 cookie cutters for several years on the track rat 944. They are dirt cheap second hand and almost as cheap as new Kumos. They are a tight fit on the 924 15x6 phones/spiders and behave almost like cantilever tires when the sidewall is so drawn in. I usually start them off at 30psi for a hot temp of around 38psi. I run turbo sways on stock suspension with koni inserts/koni adjustables. Weltmeister 250s made a difference up front. I ran 205s but it was a different drive. Not better or worse. Just different. _________________ 1973 911-RS 3.2 Track Car
1981 Porsche 931/Carrera GT Project
1981 Porsche 931 Euro W/CGT Intercooler
1984 Porsche 944 Gutted Track Car
1987 Porsche 924s Rally Style (sold 3-2012)
2000 Chevy C-2500 Pick-up
2004 Subaru Forester STi |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
emoore924
Joined: 13 Apr 2004 Posts: 2822
|
Posted: Sun Dec 25, 2011 11:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
| What does this mean "cantilever tires"...?? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|