 |
924Board.org
Discussion Forum of 924.org
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
owenexile
Joined: 05 Jun 2009
Posts: 333
Location: Australia , Bunbury
|
 Posted: Fri Jul 30, 2010 1:12 am Post subject: |
 |
|
| Lenkru wrote: | Sorry I don't have any pictures of that side. The flanges was very easy but the correct placement was a big headache apart from the height it is also very close to the body. I did increase the size of the drain pipe but I will have to measure it to give you the size.
You could fit a T3 in if you wanted but it will have too much lag. The T28 works perfect for me. |
Haha pasop sodat die flappies ni daai kar in di hande kry nie . Dit sal di volgende vinnigste ding wees deer ventersdorp 
_________________
924 1982 N/A
For some reason theres always a earth problem somewhere with this car... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Lenkru
Joined: 27 Jul 2010
Posts: 10
Location: CAPE TOWN, SOUTH AFRICA
|
| Posted: Fri Jul 30, 2010 7:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| No chance of that I made the alarm and tracker system myself. I can control the electronics from anywhere with any cell phone. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
owenexile
Joined: 05 Jun 2009
Posts: 333
Location: Australia , Bunbury
|
| Posted: Sat Jul 31, 2010 3:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Lenkru wrote: | | No chance of that I made the alarm and tracker system myself. I can control the electronics from anywhere with any cell phone. |
Wow hats of to u then. I removed my immobiliser say about 6 months ago , made sure to mark evrything. Then few days back i decided to put it back and ouch it takes a brave man to crawl in under there
_________________
924 1982 N/A
For some reason theres always a earth problem somewhere with this car... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Joakim
Joined: 15 Jun 2003
Posts: 24
Location: Sweden
|
| Posted: Mon Aug 30, 2010 2:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
| gegge wrote: | | Mike9311 wrote: | | gegge wrote: | | morghen wrote: | torque is pretty impressive 400+Nm from 3500 until redline.
power is high up in the 7K RPM |
Agree 
(But in this particular case was the valves too large and the duration too long if you ask me) |
Would you say the valves were large and the duration large to compensate for poor head flow? The better way being to have good ports and headwork (better valves/chambers) and closer to stock size valve and cam?
Do we know what rods were used in that engine? With the faster acceleration of a short rod, the intake charge would be helped by that vacuum therefore helping the NA numbers. I am just curious to what was actually done to achieve that power level. |
Yes, I am guessing that is the only way to get some flow out of the head. But 44,5mm intake valves are too close to the cylinderwall and shroudding is a serious problem (a larger bore or off-center bore will help). The 280 cam would work better with a longer tuned tubular manifold, reversion could be of concern - especially with large 38,5mm exhaust valves. Wold be interesting to know the flowbalance. The head was milled 10 degrees, the intake was raised and ported as much as possible by a legend in Sweden - "Grottis". JE pistons and Verdi rods but I donīt know the stroke/rod ratio. I think there are some benefits with a shorter rod as long as you are aware of the downsides as balance, vibrations, stress and wear.
I would take a good look on the 933 engine to make high NA hp, then turboconvert it. |
Regarding the size on the inletvalves, I have 87mm Bore, and i have moved the cylinderhead 6/10 mm to get the necessary clearance. And my new camshaft have 292 degrees of duration.
BR Joakim With 384 HP |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
924 FAQ (Technical)
