 |
924Board.org Discussion Forum of 924.org
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
931fan
Joined: 03 May 2008 Posts: 5 Location: Basingstoke
|
Posted: Thu Jul 15, 2010 2:20 am Post subject: What is the maximum power for a NA 924 |
|
|
Hi Guys
I've been lingering a while on this really great site but wondered if you could help me out?
I'm in the UK and thinking about a N/A 924 for the Historic Sports Car Championship 70's roadsports class see
http://www.hscc.org.uk/
I've raced a 924 in the Colway tyres series back in the mid 90's (that's me in red 57) so have some experience with car prep but I'd would really like to get stuck into a car build specifically for the 70's Roadsports as above.
To get competitive I really need make more power as, according to the regs the weight has to be 2376lbs.
The cam, compression, valves sizes, piston (+40 thou is allowed)and combustion chamber shape, exhaust and manifold can all be modified but I would have to run it on the standard K jet induction.
Has anyone been down a similar route to try and maximise what's possible bearing in mind the limitations? Failing that can anyone hazard an experienced based guess on what sort of power that I could reasonably expect if all the parts were optimised as above and the usual gas flowing, blueprinting, lightening steps were taken?
Thanks all
Steve _________________ Whether you think you can or think you can't - you are right. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ideola

Joined: 01 Oct 2004 Posts: 15550 Location: Spring Lake MI
|
Posted: Thu Jul 15, 2010 3:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
I doubt CIS will be your constraint on an NA. Dave Dennet's car is the most powerful (documeted) NA I am personally aware of (not including the factory D-Prod cars...). Details are here: http://www.924board.org/viewtopic.php?t=23247
Note the discussion around displacement, though...there is no evidence that the car actually had 2.4L of displacement...the specs seem to suggest 2.2L. FWIW, a board member here, daveo, now owns that car, but last I knew had some engine internal issues. See these threads:
http://www.924board.org/viewtopic.php?t=29085
http://www.924board.org/viewtopic.php?t=29837
I believe 924RACR has achieved something in the 130-140 BHP range, and that's with the limited mods allowed by ITB. So 140 should be fairly easily obtained with high compression oversized pistons and a big valve head, plus a header. You could consider a stroker, but not sure the ~$2500 cost would be warranted. You might be better served to knife edge the crank and run the lightweight Crower rods we commissioned; also add in a crank scraper.
For cam, I would recommend discussing your plans with Steve Greunwald at Integral Cams. For a full-on race application, I suspect his Stage 2 or Stage 3 would pair nicely with the other mods discussed.
And now for the obligatory shameless plug: I can help you source virtually everything you would need, minus the cam (go direct to Steve). That would include all of the performance bits, as well as the standard rebuild components like gasket sets, plug wires, etc. You can see a list of all the available components on my website with pricing:
http://garage.ideola.com/prod-2LEngineMods.html
http://garage.ideola.com/prod-Kingsborne.html
http://garage.ideola.com/prod-Kits.html
I have shipped extensively to international customers, so no worries there. Everything but the crank could be shipped fairly economically, best to have your crank work done locally. I can also get the crank scrapers, although I haven't added them to the site yet. Feel free to PM or email: dan DOT beckett AT ideola DOT com. _________________ erstwhile owner of just about every 924 variant ever made |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
fiat22turbo

Joined: 18 Jan 2006 Posts: 4040 Location: Portland, OR
|
Posted: Thu Jul 15, 2010 4:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
Spend all of your money on fixing the flow in the head.
I repeat:
Spend all of your money on fixing the flow in the head.
There are some interesting links in the Performance Upgrades section, check out the sticky post at the top and kick back with a good beverage and do some reading. There's one thread that shows a cut away of the intake and exhaust ports for the NA and turbo heads. They aren't very good ports.
The rest is just parts and careful assembly. Head work requires lots of experience, labor and testing to get it right.
Some thoughts off the top of my head:
Up the compression as high as you can (depending on the gas you want to or can run)
Lighten the rotating assembly as much as possible by knife-edging the crank. Use custom rods to increase high RPM durability. Build an aluminum flywheel with a lightweight racing clutch. Build an oil scraper to keep the oil in the pan and off the crank/rods.
Can you increase the stroke of the motor? offset grinding the crank journals can help increase displacement, which helps with torque output.
Then look at where the next bottle neck is. My guess would be the intake system. The extra turns the air takes into the engine doesn't help flow. See if you can straighten it out a bit more. I've also heard someone mention that the flapper in the fuel distributor can be effected by the G-forces in the car. So while investigating the air flow, look at what happens to the flapper when the car is most likely to be heavily loaded or have to change directions quickly.
I might look at a Lehmann inspired intake to improve distribution to the cylinders (not necessarily increase flow, but certainly to even it out, ensuring each cylinder is making the same power).
http://www.jasperintegration.com/distribution-plenum.html
http://www.bufkinengineering.com/intake%20manifolds.htm
http://www.elitedubs.com/index.php?topic=2275.0
http://forum.miata.net/vb/showthread.php?t=300335
At the very least a stock intake bottom combined with a larger plenum and throttle body could be a decent gain provided the K-jet doesn't become a restriction at that point.
A UT-CIS might also help you fine tune the fuel delivery while still keeping the K-jet, but that depends on the rules and what they'll allow.
http://unwiredtools.com/utcis.asp
A Franco Automatic timing gear can help widen the power curve a bit, but they are rare, expensive and add to your maintenance cycle. It will however help maximize the larger race cams because you're not having to sacrifice as much power at one end of the power curve or the other.
http://thorin.adnc.com/~figf/
http://forums.vwvortex.com/showthread.php?678454
Claims of gaining 5-10hp doesn't seem like much until you look at the power curves on the dyno plots and realize that while peak power changed only slightly, the area under the curve increased quite a bit, which is important in engine tuning. If you can make more HP at a lower RPM than your competitor and continue making power all the way to redline, then you'll be able to accelerate faster than they will and you'll be able to do it nearly anywhere.
Programmable ignition will help widen the power output as well, many people have found power in tuning the ignition on these cars. If you happen to find and use one of the Franco gears, keep in mind that the timing gear will also alter the ignition timing at the distributor.
A knock sensor might be a worthwhile investment to protect the internals in case you go too far with the tune. Certainly a wide band oxygen sensor and a set of EGT's that you can log their data will help in tuning.
For longevity's sake, you can look into improving the cooling system by using an electric water pump and reversing coolant flow through the engine. Seems to help reduce hot spots on the turbo cars, so a high compression NA motor should see some improvements as well.
I could guess at power figures, but I'd probably be wrong. Just figure that you'll be starting at 125hp and heading towards 200hp, if everything was perfect, in reality you'll be somewhere in the middle. _________________ Stefan
1979 924 Carrera GTS (clone-ish)
1988 944 Turbo S (Silver Rose) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ideola

Joined: 01 Oct 2004 Posts: 15550 Location: Spring Lake MI
|
Posted: Thu Jul 15, 2010 4:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
I'm pretty sure the G-sensitive AFM is only an issue on the 931, as the flapper travels the opposite direction than on the NA cars...
| ideola wrote: | I found another reason to do the fixed headlight conversion: copying Peter Utzon's re-orientation of the fuel distribution unit.
Before:
After:
I had investigated this for one of my other cars (maybe the 941, can't remember now), but had eliminated it from consideration because I didn't want to futz with the headlight bars. As you can see in these two photos, removing the headlight lifting mechanism makes it much easier to reorient the fuel dizzy. Why, you ask?
| Quote: | G-sensitive air flow meter
A few years ago I noticed a strange thing on my 931. Every time I turned right revving about 4000rpm on full throttle the engine started knocking.
This didn't happen when I turned left under the same conditions.
I looked at the gauges and everything was OK.
When I came home I looked at an air flow meter I had in my garage. When I turned it I noticed that it is extremely G-sensitive. When turning one way it opens and vice versa.
What happened was that the air fuel mixture became too lean in right turns and too rich in left turns.
I have now solved this problem by turning the meter 90 degrees so now it goes lean when braking han rich when accelerating. |
http://www.utzon.se/gamla/My931/My931.html |
_________________ erstwhile owner of just about every 924 variant ever made |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
zimm

Joined: 18 Oct 2006 Posts: 62 Location: Hereford, UK.
|
Posted: Thu Jul 15, 2010 5:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hi,
nothing to add to the above technical advice really, the heads the biggest issue with regard to power
do everything and i'd guess you'd be around 140bhp @ the wheels on a good day.
this may be a good starting point for you if its still there ..
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=330441014706&ssPageName=STRK:MEWAX:IT
not mine.. i viewed it a few weeks back as a potential parts car for another build, but something else came up. They were very open to offers, just want the space back. _________________ 6 bikes, 9 cars, 1 van.... the more you have the less they work. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
931fan
Joined: 03 May 2008 Posts: 5 Location: Basingstoke
|
Posted: Thu Jul 15, 2010 6:55 am Post subject: NA 924 power |
|
|
Big thanks for all your help guys.
It would appear that I have some reading to do!!
If I could get to 140 at the rear wheels along with a set of 'short' ratio's it would definitely make the car competitive in it's class.
I'll let you know how it goes.
Fantastic site ideola I'll be visiting again for sure when my engine spec has been finalised with the builder.
Steve _________________ Whether you think you can or think you can't - you are right. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
931fan
Joined: 03 May 2008 Posts: 5 Location: Basingstoke
|
Posted: Thu Jul 15, 2010 7:02 am Post subject: 924 racer |
|
|
| zimm wrote: | Hi,
nothing to add to the above technical advice really, the heads the biggest issue with regard to power
do everything and i'd guess you'd be around 140bhp @ the wheels on a good day.
this may be a good starting point for you if its still there ..
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=330441014706&ssPageName=STRK:MEWAX:IT
not mine.. i viewed it a few weeks back as a potential parts car for another build, but something else came up. They were very open to offers, just want the space back. |
Thanks Zimm. I was going to keep my eyes open for an Ex racer as all the major work will have been done but do you know how much they would take? PM if you'd prefer.
Thanks again
Steve _________________ Whether you think you can or think you can't - you are right. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ideola

Joined: 01 Oct 2004 Posts: 15550 Location: Spring Lake MI
|
Posted: Thu Jul 15, 2010 7:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
Also, be sure to check out posts from 924RACR and his website, complete with build pix. Not all of the build details are the latest version of his car, but it will give you insight into things a real racer has done to milk power out of the 2.0L lump.
http://www.vaughanscott.com/
http://www.vaughanscott.com/construction.htm _________________ erstwhile owner of just about every 924 variant ever made |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
924RACR

Joined: 29 Jul 2001 Posts: 9070 Location: Royal Oak, MI, USA
|
Posted: Thu Jul 15, 2010 11:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Perhaps an easier way to do this would be to figure out, based on your weight, how much power you'd need to make to be competitive, and then figure out what it'd take (in resources and cost) to make that happen. _________________ Vaughan Scott
Webmeister
'79 924 #77 SCCA H Prod racecar
'82 931 Plat. Silver
#25 Hidari Firefly P2 sports prototype |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Joes924Racer

Joined: 03 Nov 2002 Posts: 11964 Location: Oregon, Denver Colorado native!
|
Posted: Thu Jul 15, 2010 11:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The colway series looks nice.. very nicely prepped cars and fun
smashing time I bet. I think all items you mentioned if done right
would net you more that 140 more like 150 - 155. Youd have
a huge enough increase in performance to give you a new
grip on racing.
A better breathing head is nice with a big open set of headers &
a ignition kick ... plus the cam.. Being Ive there done that only on
the street .. though.
Nice pics yea theres a few good people here youll step up and
give you a hand here anytime .. thats nice. _________________ 1979 porsche 924 Na
1980 porsche Turbo 931GT Replica
Have u ever driven a turbo. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
931fan
Joined: 03 May 2008 Posts: 5 Location: Basingstoke
|
Posted: Fri Jul 16, 2010 2:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
| 924RACR wrote: | | Perhaps an easier way to do this would be to figure out, based on your weight, how much power you'd need to make to be competitive, and then figure out what it'd take (in resources and cost) to make that happen. |
The car that won the class last year was a Jensen Healey GT with around 160bhp at the flywheel. The minimum weight for that car is 2024 lbs so that works out to be 79bhp per ton to get the same bhp per ton in the 924 with a minimum weight of 2376lbs I'd need to have 187bhp which is unlikely of course. Having said that I think the 924 would handle much better than the Healey so I think if it could be developed to 165-170 it'll be in touch with the Healey because of the superior handling around a lap. Maybe the Healey would have an advantage at the power circuits and the 924 would be better at the twisty ones.
Is it possible to get 165-170 out of one bearing in mind the limitations?
Steve _________________ Whether you think you can or think you can't - you are right. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
fiat22turbo

Joined: 18 Jan 2006 Posts: 4040 Location: Portland, OR
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
zimm

Joined: 18 Oct 2006 Posts: 62 Location: Hereford, UK.
|
Posted: Fri Jul 16, 2010 8:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
| 931fan wrote: |
Is it possible to get 165-170 out of one bearing in mind the limitations?
Steve |
bear in mind the turbo only made 170-177, thats with a better head, and boost.
the bottom end is plenty strong, but the topend is chronically (intentionally?) asthmatic.
also, there's not much by way of performance cams .. the piper one for the old 924 series is hardly wild, and i dont know of another off the shelf
however .. 924's are torquey little things, cis means hiccup free accelleration and the weight distribution/suspension mean you can mostly make full use of whatever power is available
compared to a lot of 70's stuff with peaky carbed 170bhp engines, leaf springs and archaic layout/geometry*, it should be quite competitive.
*a jensen healey being essentially a vauxhall viva in a fugly body with a lotus engine.. so the only good bit is the bit renowned for being finicky and unreliable. _________________ 6 bikes, 9 cars, 1 van.... the more you have the less they work. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ideola

Joined: 01 Oct 2004 Posts: 15550 Location: Spring Lake MI
|
Posted: Fri Jul 16, 2010 9:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
| zimm wrote: | | bear in mind the turbo only made 170-177, thats with a better head, and boost. |
According to the flow tests we had done last year, the 931 head is NOT any better than the NA head. The D-Prod guys were using 931 heads with custom raised floors and much porting, they were definitely not stock 931 heads; I believe this is where the myth arose. The EMW big valve head is The Way To Go, unless you can talk Jon Mitchell into setting up a head for you, or divulging his secrets.
http://www.jmgarage.com/
| zimm wrote: | | there's not much by way of performance cams .. the piper one for the old 924 series is hardly wild, and i dont know of another off the shelf |
There are plenty of off the shelf options for cams besides Piper. Webcam and Integral both have multiple grinds available. As noted above, I would recommend the Integral Stage2 or 3 for full-on race, but best speak with Steve about your engine first.
If CR is no limit, than just go with the highest CR you can afford gas for. Why not do 11:1??? That'll wake things up! As I said, highest CR, biggest bore, big valve head with porting, Integral Stage 3, and a Bursch or Stahl header, I bet you'll get pretty close to 150 BHP at least...maybe even more.
Recommended reading on the 931 & 924 heads:
http://www.924board.org/viewtopic.php?t=6579
http://www.924board.org/viewtopic.php?p=260392#260392 _________________ erstwhile owner of just about every 924 variant ever made |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
924RACR

Joined: 29 Jul 2001 Posts: 9070 Location: Royal Oak, MI, USA
|
Posted: Sat Jul 17, 2010 4:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
That'd be pretty tough to manage, but I think with the right budget, and no limitations, you might be able to pull it off. In addition to getting the '24 down to weight.
Not the cheapest way/place to play... _________________ Vaughan Scott
Webmeister
'79 924 #77 SCCA H Prod racecar
'82 931 Plat. Silver
#25 Hidari Firefly P2 sports prototype |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|