| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
newman931
Joined: 25 Oct 2009 Posts: 30 Location: Tennessee, USA
|
Posted: Sun Feb 14, 2010 9:15 am Post subject: years intake manifold will fit?? |
|
|
will a 1980 924 turbo intake manifold fit a 1982 924 turbo?
did it change at all? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
9XX Girl!

Joined: 20 Sep 2009 Posts: 1617 Location: Cornish Riviera SW England
|
Posted: Sun Feb 14, 2010 9:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
it changed all right
1976-79 Part #931 110 059 01
1980-85 Part #477 133 201
Will it fit ? Don't know! _________________ 924 (84) N/A 2 ltr - 5 Speed - BLACK - Project (looking for 200BHP, any ideas!)
924 (81) N/A 2 ltr - 3 Speed Auto - SURINAM RED (Metallic) - Near Original Spec (sticking with originality)
BOTH ON THE ROAD, BOTH USED EVERY-OTHER DAY |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ideola

Joined: 01 Oct 2004 Posts: 15550 Location: Spring Lake MI
|
Posted: Sun Feb 14, 2010 10:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
The S1 (1979-1980) 931 manifold will bolt on to any 931 head with no problem. However, the bigger issue is that the intake tract changed. The S1 upper charge tube has an ovoid end on it with a rubber connector, which connects to the dual butterfly Audi style throttle body. The S2 upper charge tube has a round end on it, makes a solid connection (i.e. no rubber connector between the charge tube and TB), and the single-butterfly round throttle body uses the same basic casting as the early 944 and 924S.
Why do you want to use an S1 intake manifold on an S2? _________________ erstwhile owner of just about every 924 variant ever made |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
newman931
Joined: 25 Oct 2009 Posts: 30 Location: Tennessee, USA
|
Posted: Sun Feb 14, 2010 11:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
| the intake is aluminum - correct??? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
newman931
Joined: 25 Oct 2009 Posts: 30 Location: Tennessee, USA
|
Posted: Sun Feb 14, 2010 11:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
guess i should specify...
'80 AND '82 intakes aluminum??? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
newman931
Joined: 25 Oct 2009 Posts: 30 Location: Tennessee, USA
|
Posted: Sun Feb 14, 2010 11:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
oh yeah,
does the air volume space in the area of the intake just behind the TB, prior to head matter? is it necessary?
i'm trying to fabricate an intake that floats over the driver's side instead of over the top... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
newman931
Joined: 25 Oct 2009 Posts: 30 Location: Tennessee, USA
|
Posted: Sun Feb 14, 2010 11:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
... out of an extra '80 intake manifold to my '82 931.
make sense??? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ideola

Joined: 01 Oct 2004 Posts: 15550 Location: Spring Lake MI
|
Posted: Sun Feb 14, 2010 12:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yes, the intakes are alu. According to my welder, not the greatest quality either, fairly porous and not the easiest to weld.
If by the "area behind the TB" you mean the plenum, the size, shape and orientation of the plenum relative to the TB inlet and the runners is very important for equal distribution of air across the four runners. The entire manifold must be designed to contain enough volume of air, and to distribute it evenly across the four runners so that you don't end up with badly mismatched volumes of air.
This is why on my custom manifold I went for a diffuser design. The tapered cylindrical shape of the diffuser plenum, along with the interface slot, are intended to accelerate air toward the back of the plenum, allowing for equal distribution of air across the interface port. The port itself must be slightly larger in surface area than the TB opening so as not to create a positive pressure differential against the flow of incoming pressurized charge air.
If you are attempting to design your own plenum, suggest picking up some texts on the subject, as there are some basic design principals you should observe regarding volume and chamber design relative to the inlet (TB) and runners. _________________ erstwhile owner of just about every 924 variant ever made |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
newman931
Joined: 25 Oct 2009 Posts: 30 Location: Tennessee, USA
|
Posted: Sun Feb 14, 2010 12:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
oh my!
buddy of mine that fabs is gonna help me do it.
wish i could just twist and stretch what's there!
wait...
we can move the pleum (sorry for spelling) which would negate having to make TB adapter! theoretically. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ideola

Joined: 01 Oct 2004 Posts: 15550 Location: Spring Lake MI
|
Posted: Sun Feb 14, 2010 12:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
What are you trying to accomplish and why are you wishing to modify the stock manifold? _________________ erstwhile owner of just about every 924 variant ever made |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
newman931
Joined: 25 Oct 2009 Posts: 30 Location: Tennessee, USA
|
Posted: Sun Feb 14, 2010 12:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
shorten plumbing for intercooler.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|