 |
924Board.org Discussion Forum of 924.org
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Khal

Joined: 26 Sep 2003 Posts: 4872 Location: Sunny and lovely interior BC, Canada
|
Posted: Sat Mar 28, 2009 2:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Rich H wrote: | | ...some cars with regenerative braking that saves up 80 bhp of 'boost' for 6 seconds. |
Yeah, and they're allowed to charge it before they start the race, and they're allowed to use it once they hit 100km/h (60mph-odd)... i.e. about two-and-half seconds after the green light... i.e. before they get to the first corner...
How many of 'em you reckon are gonna go ballistic straight into the wall?!  _________________ '80 924 Turbo |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
DOCO

Joined: 04 Aug 2006 Posts: 1111 Location: Keswick Ontario Canada
|
Posted: Sat Mar 28, 2009 3:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
AH thank you i thought it may have something to do with formula just wasnt sure what the circus part was.  _________________ Doco "where am i going and why am i in this handbasket"author unknown
79 924 N/A "Webster"
_______
/______\
[+]___[+]
\0 924 0/
[__]..[__]
"WEBB STR" |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Brockoli

Joined: 06 Feb 2007 Posts: 621 Location: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
|
Posted: Sat Mar 28, 2009 3:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
I think it is crazy that the drivers can change the front wing angle on the fly(not the whole wing but pieces on the side), I only wish my front valence wasnt bent.lol _________________ '80 924 M471,Wideband O2, Full coilover susp,23/19 sways,Bilstiens,KLA Strut Brace,Roll Bar,Test Pipe,BBS RS, Willwood BBK
25% of a '87 944 Chumpcar http://straightpipe.ca/forums/showthread.php?t=2454
'79 924 Sebring Edition(Sitting) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Khal

Joined: 26 Sep 2003 Posts: 4872 Location: Sunny and lovely interior BC, Canada
|
Posted: Sat Mar 28, 2009 5:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Fantastic. Just fantasic. And it's not even race day... _________________ '80 924 Turbo |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Khal

Joined: 26 Sep 2003 Posts: 4872 Location: Sunny and lovely interior BC, Canada
|
Posted: Tue Mar 31, 2009 3:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
Oh, the carnage! The controversy!
Hamilton gets third (how does he keep doing that?! ) and is poised to take the win when -you notice I didn't say "if" -they rule against the trick diffuser...
What will happen next week?! _________________ '80 924 Turbo |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Brockoli

Joined: 06 Feb 2007 Posts: 621 Location: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
|
Posted: Tue Mar 31, 2009 4:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
that trick diffuser was a big difference.
it reminds me of something I read in the 24hrs of lemons cheaters guide, "there are 2 kinds of racers, losers and cheaters."  _________________ '80 924 M471,Wideband O2, Full coilover susp,23/19 sways,Bilstiens,KLA Strut Brace,Roll Bar,Test Pipe,BBS RS, Willwood BBK
25% of a '87 944 Chumpcar http://straightpipe.ca/forums/showthread.php?t=2454
'79 924 Sebring Edition(Sitting) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Khal

Joined: 26 Sep 2003 Posts: 4872 Location: Sunny and lovely interior BC, Canada
|
Posted: Tue Mar 31, 2009 4:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Brockoli wrote: | "there are 2 kinds of racers, losers and cheaters." |
Yeah.
Arguably (and they are arguing it!), they weren't "cheating", as such. Just a clever interpretation of the rules.
I don't care either way. But I reckon it's all but a certainty that the trick diffuser will be disallowed, for a number of reasons, and the race wins ('cause they'll no doubt race with it again in Malaysia) will be awarded to the next in line without the diffuser.
Reason the first; Ferrari don't have it Secondly, there's no further (proper) testing allowed, so even if the other teams were allowed the trick diffuser, they couldn't develop it properly (and at least one team not at all, apparently). Finally, the majority of teams don't have it. I think, even in F1, it would be unlikely that they'd continue to allow a single part that gives just a few teams such an obvious advantage.
It's gonna make for some interesting times in the next couple of races! _________________ '80 924 Turbo |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ic932
Joined: 11 Feb 2005 Posts: 1104 Location: UK
|
Posted: Tue Mar 31, 2009 8:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
I can't remember a Grandprix that I enjoyed as much as this one..must be a good few years anyway lol...now addicted  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
steeny
Joined: 24 Nov 2005 Posts: 319 Location: Brisbane, Australia
|
Posted: Tue Mar 31, 2009 8:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
I say let em race with it. Just because the other teams failed to interpret the rules properly, that's their fault.
anyway, was a good race on the weekend. nice to see the Brawn cars so reliable in the first race _________________ 1978 924 N/A
she's gone..... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Khal

Joined: 26 Sep 2003 Posts: 4872 Location: Sunny and lovely interior BC, Canada
|
Posted: Tue Mar 31, 2009 9:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
| steeny wrote: | | I say let em race with it. Just because the other teams failed to interpret the rules properly, that's their fault. |
It's not about interpreting the rules "properly", just differently. It wasn't a failure on the other teams' part. Quite the contrary, I vaguely recall hearing that there was some meeting where the intent of the rule was explained to all but the three teams that differently interpreted the rule.
Still, I can't help but be impressed when an engineer/team exploits a grey area so well. I'm tempted to agree that they should be allowed to continue using it, assuming that the rule can actually be interpreted that way -I haven't read the actual rule, so I don't know... I guess there's a possibility that what those three teams have done is technically illegal... _________________ '80 924 Turbo |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
steeny
Joined: 24 Nov 2005 Posts: 319 Location: Brisbane, Australia
|
Posted: Tue Mar 31, 2009 11:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
Yeah, i see where your coming from khal. I personally would love to go back to the twin turbo, balls to the wall fastest shit we can build being what F1 is all about.
I'm not convinced that all these rules make it any better to watch.
as for engineers and exploiting grey areas, thats what they are there for. like laywers and loopholes, or peanut butter and jam. _________________ 1978 924 N/A
she's gone..... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Paul

Joined: 02 Nov 2002 Posts: 9491 Location: Southeast Wisconsin
|
Posted: Tue Mar 31, 2009 11:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
I wish they would bring back Can Am.....
from:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Can-Am
Can-Am started out as a race series for Group 7 sports racers with two races in Canada (Can) and four races in the United States of America (Am). The series was initially sponsored by Johnson Wax. The Series used the FIA Group 7 category with unrestricted engine capacity.
The Group 7 category was essentially a formule libre for sports cars; the regulations were minimal and permitted unlimited engine sizes (and allowed turbocharging and supercharging), virtually unrestricted aerodynamics, and were as close as any major international racing series ever got to anything goes. As long as the car had two seats and bodywork enclosing the wheels, and met basic safety standards, it was legal. Group 7 had arisen as a category for non-homologated sports car 'specials' in Europe and for a while in the 1960s Group 7 racing was popular in the United Kingdom as well as a class in hillclimb racing in Europe. Group 7 cars were designed more for short-distance sprints than for endurance racing. Some Group 7 cars were also built in Japan by Nissan and Toyota, but these did not compete outside their homeland (though some of the Can-Am competitors went over to race against them occasionally). _________________ White 87 924S "Ghost"
Silver 98 986 3.6l 320 HP "Frank N Stein"
White 01 986 "Christine"
Polar Silver 02 996TT. "Turbo"
Owned and repaired 924s since 1977
Porsche: It's not driving, it's therapy. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Brockoli

Joined: 06 Feb 2007 Posts: 621 Location: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
|
Posted: Tue Mar 31, 2009 12:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I think they should be allowed to race with the diffuser. If they had the smartest engineers (smartest being the brightest to cheat) then it should not be any different than an engineer that made an engine that out preforms everyone else. As long as there isnt a clear rule against it, the diffuser should stay.
This reminds me of a historic F1 race where I saw that 6 wheeled car. I dont know the history as I believe it was before my time. But I bet it happened the same way. A bigg loop hole in the rules that someone found. Kind of like those dumb Disney movies where a dog plays basketball because its a loophole
heres a wiki link to the 6 wheel car
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tyrrell_P34
or how about the fan car that was in F1. Cooling fan my ass.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brabham_BT46
 _________________ '80 924 M471,Wideband O2, Full coilover susp,23/19 sways,Bilstiens,KLA Strut Brace,Roll Bar,Test Pipe,BBS RS, Willwood BBK
25% of a '87 944 Chumpcar http://straightpipe.ca/forums/showthread.php?t=2454
'79 924 Sebring Edition(Sitting) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Khal

Joined: 26 Sep 2003 Posts: 4872 Location: Sunny and lovely interior BC, Canada
|
Posted: Tue Mar 31, 2009 1:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'd never seen the "fan car" before! I knew there was a few whacky concepts tried over the years. That's a ripper! I'd seen (and read about) the Tyrrell six-wheeler.
Interesting that the "fan car" was made by/for the Brabham team. Sir Jack Brabham is the only person to win the F1 championship in his own car. And an Aussie, to boot!  _________________ '80 924 Turbo |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
emoore924
Joined: 13 Apr 2004 Posts: 2822
|
Posted: Wed Apr 01, 2009 2:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
There were a couple more "fan cars"...
One ran away from the field at indy in the late 60's (or thereabouts) until an unrealted failure just before the end of the race. Outlawed shortly thereafter. STP sponsorship, IIRC. Granatelli, something like that.
And then there were the Chaparrals "sucker cars" with the snowmobile engines. mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|