| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| What would be the right 924 for me? |
| A regular '81 or '82 924 |
|
33% |
[ 5 ] |
| A '81 or '82 924 Turbo |
|
20% |
[ 3 ] |
| An '87 or '88 Series II |
|
46% |
[ 7 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 15 |
|
| Author |
Message |
924RACR

Joined: 29 Jul 2001 Posts: 9080 Location: Royal Oak, MI, USA
|
Posted: Fri Jan 23, 2009 11:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Personally, I'm voting for the NA 2.0L. Simple and robust. I think the turbos are just too touchy for the nonexistent support network you have. They can end up reliable, but it's a long and more expensive road there. You'll be working on stereo and carpet and cosmetics with an NA where you'dbe fighting boost leaks and funny running symptoms in a turbo, most likely.
I'll cede to Dan's experience with the 924S - I only restored one and passed it on. _________________ Vaughan Scott
Webmeister
'79 924 #77 SCCA H Prod racecar
'82 931 Plat. Silver
#25 Hidari Firefly P2 sports prototype |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Pelican924
Joined: 20 Aug 2006 Posts: 98 Location: Mountains of WNC
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Paul

Joined: 02 Nov 2002 Posts: 9491 Location: Southeast Wisconsin
|
Posted: Sat Jan 24, 2009 1:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I've owned them all (except a Carrera GT), fixed them all, competed in them all, and the cheapest to own and most reliable 924 in my experience is a 81 or 82 NA standard shift. Yes, I have owned automatic 924 cars, stay away please.
I suspect that most of us who have owned or still own a 931 have spent more than $10K on it including the original cost. In my case I'm closer to $15k. You can buy a nice Boxster for that price.
924S Porsches are better and more refined cars than an NA or a 931 but as they age they have hard to diagnose (and expensive to fix) running issues especially in cold climates. They also like to leak engine oil and power steering fluid. _________________ White 87 924S "Ghost"
Silver 98 986 3.6l 320 HP "Frank N Stein"
White 01 986 "Christine"
Polar Silver 02 996TT. "Turbo"
Owned and repaired 924s since 1977
Porsche: It's not driving, it's therapy. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sebring '79

Joined: 23 Jan 2009 Posts: 22 Location: San Diego, California
|
Posted: Sat Jan 24, 2009 1:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks Paul
Assuming that I stick with the 1981-1982 cars for a moment, how much LESS reliable and expensive is the 924 Turbo than the same year NAs?
Is there anyway to roughly quantify that?
Am I getting 50% more fun with a Turbo for 500% more expense and trouble, or is the equation the other way around?
I guess what I'm trying to say is: does the added trouble and expense of a 924 Turbo lineally scale with the extra speed?
Hopefully I'm making sense. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Paul

Joined: 02 Nov 2002 Posts: 9491 Location: Southeast Wisconsin
|
Posted: Sat Jan 24, 2009 2:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Are you changing your original question?
Most 924 Porsches will need to be mechanically restored to be reliable.
In order of increasing cost, mechanical skills, and tools to do this:
924
931
924S
My favorite 924 is a 931, but I have the time, money, tools and knowledge to maintain it. Now I just have to find the motivation to put it back together! _________________ White 87 924S "Ghost"
Silver 98 986 3.6l 320 HP "Frank N Stein"
White 01 986 "Christine"
Polar Silver 02 996TT. "Turbo"
Owned and repaired 924s since 1977
Porsche: It's not driving, it's therapy. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sebring '79

Joined: 23 Jan 2009 Posts: 22 Location: San Diego, California
|
Posted: Sat Jan 24, 2009 2:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Paul wrote: | Are you changing your original question?
|
No, just expanding the scope of my inquiry.
I was just courious as to how great the difference was in care and expense between the 924 NA and the 924 Turbo.
If the turbo is not too much more trouble and expense, then I'd rather have a turbo, if however it's going to double my overall cost of ownership then I'll go with the NA. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Paul

Joined: 02 Nov 2002 Posts: 9491 Location: Southeast Wisconsin
|
Posted: Sat Jan 24, 2009 2:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
IIRC a stock 931 has less than 40 hp more than an 82 924, how much is that worth? _________________ White 87 924S "Ghost"
Silver 98 986 3.6l 320 HP "Frank N Stein"
White 01 986 "Christine"
Polar Silver 02 996TT. "Turbo"
Owned and repaired 924s since 1977
Porsche: It's not driving, it's therapy. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sebring '79

Joined: 23 Jan 2009 Posts: 22 Location: San Diego, California
|
Posted: Sat Jan 24, 2009 2:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Paul wrote: | | IIRC a stock 931 has less than 40 hp more than an 82 924, how much is that worth? |
I thought the difference was closer to 60 HP.
To me a 931 is worth an extra $600-$900 a year in maintenance costs, averaged over an expected 5-year life of ownership.
I just need to get a handle on what I'm really looking at here. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Paul

Joined: 02 Nov 2002 Posts: 9491 Location: Southeast Wisconsin
|
Posted: Sat Jan 24, 2009 2:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Once both a NA and a 931 have been mechanically restored, both if used regularly will run for years with oil, filter, and spark plug changes. Both will need valve adjustment checks once a year or so.
The point is the 931 will cost a lot more to mechanically restore and requires a higher level of skill. _________________ White 87 924S "Ghost"
Silver 98 986 3.6l 320 HP "Frank N Stein"
White 01 986 "Christine"
Polar Silver 02 996TT. "Turbo"
Owned and repaired 924s since 1977
Porsche: It's not driving, it's therapy. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sebring '79

Joined: 23 Jan 2009 Posts: 22 Location: San Diego, California
|
Posted: Sat Jan 24, 2009 2:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Paul wrote: | Once both a NA and a 931 have been mechanically restored, both if used regularly will run for years with oil, filter, and spark plug changes. Both will need valve adjustment checks once a year or so.
The point is the 931 will cost a lot more to mechanically restore and requires a higher level of skill. |
OK, that's what I'm getting at.
Thank you!
So, after I rebuild/restore either car, they both should run about as reliable as each other (assuming I don't get stupid or unlucky), but I'm looking at a higher upfront cost on the restoration on the 931.
Am I understanding that right?
While we are on the topic, would a budget of about $2,500 for the car with an additional cost of about $6,000 in mechanical rehab be realistic, or am I way off?
Last edited by Sebring '79 on Sat Jan 24, 2009 2:52 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Paul

Joined: 02 Nov 2002 Posts: 9491 Location: Southeast Wisconsin
|
Posted: Sat Jan 24, 2009 2:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
1977-1982 Porsche 924 Specifications
Prices New:
$9,395 for 1977 model
$16,770 for 1982 model
Dimensions:Length (inches) Wheelbase (inches) Weight (pounds)
170.1 94.5 2,625
Engines:Size (cc)
Type
Horsepower
Years
1984
sohc I-4
95
1977-1979
1984
sohc I-4
115
1980-1982
1980-1982 Porsche 924 Turbo Specifications
Prices New:
$20,800 for 1980 model
$21,500 for 1982 model
Dimensions:Length (inches) Wheelbase (inches) Weight (pounds)
170.1 94.5 2,780
Engines:Size (cc)
Type
Horsepower
Years
1984
Turbo sohc I-4
143
1980-1981
1984
Turbo sohc I-4
154
1982 _________________ White 87 924S "Ghost"
Silver 98 986 3.6l 320 HP "Frank N Stein"
White 01 986 "Christine"
Polar Silver 02 996TT. "Turbo"
Owned and repaired 924s since 1977
Porsche: It's not driving, it's therapy. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Paul

Joined: 02 Nov 2002 Posts: 9491 Location: Southeast Wisconsin
|
Posted: Sat Jan 24, 2009 2:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
When it comes to buying cars, my advice is to find one that someone has already restored and is now bored with it. For many of us it is more fun to fix it than to own it. Sick? Probably but it happens all time, even on this board.
Parts for NAs and 931s are becoming scarce and soon will make a 924S the most cost effective 924 to restore. _________________ White 87 924S "Ghost"
Silver 98 986 3.6l 320 HP "Frank N Stein"
White 01 986 "Christine"
Polar Silver 02 996TT. "Turbo"
Owned and repaired 924s since 1977
Porsche: It's not driving, it's therapy. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sebring '79

Joined: 23 Jan 2009 Posts: 22 Location: San Diego, California
|
Posted: Sat Jan 24, 2009 2:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Paul wrote: | When it comes to buying cars, my advice is to find one that someone has already restored and is now bored with it. For many of us it is more fun to fix it then to own it. Sick? Probably but it happens all time, even on this board.
Parts for NAs and 931s are becoming scarce and soon will make a 924S the most cost effective 924 to restore. |
Thank you very much.
Yes, I completely understand that, and If I had the money, space, and equipment, I would do the same.
The only question that leaves is finding an example that has actually been restored and not Mickey Moused or butchered.
Thanks again Paul. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Paul

Joined: 02 Nov 2002 Posts: 9491 Location: Southeast Wisconsin
|
Posted: Sat Jan 24, 2009 2:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
$2500 + $6000 will buy an almost museum quality all original 924 NA. _________________ White 87 924S "Ghost"
Silver 98 986 3.6l 320 HP "Frank N Stein"
White 01 986 "Christine"
Polar Silver 02 996TT. "Turbo"
Owned and repaired 924s since 1977
Porsche: It's not driving, it's therapy. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sebring '79

Joined: 23 Jan 2009 Posts: 22 Location: San Diego, California
|
Posted: Sat Jan 24, 2009 3:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Paul wrote: | | $2500 + $6000 will buy an almost museum quality all original 924 NA. |
I'd think too!  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|