| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Kevin D
Joined: 28 Jul 2005 Posts: 152 Location: Boise, ID
|
Posted: Fri Jun 09, 2006 1:55 pm Post subject: Ride Height even front to rear |
|
|
Measuring behind the front wheels from the ground to body and in front of the rear wheels from ground to body my car sits right at 6". I have Koni sports front and rear with prog springs on the front. The actual spring rate is a mystery. Anyhow, I have a set of adjustable ride height struts that came with the car and am thinking about trying them out. I was told they were 250lb springs. If I make the swap, I will have many more questions, but right now I am curious about that ride height. Is it desirable to keep things flat or do you drop the front a little? _________________ '88 924S 3L 6sp RedRat
'92 Duc 900ss
'02 Duc 998 Carbon
'72 RD 350 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Paul

Joined: 02 Nov 2002 Posts: 9491 Location: Southeast Wisconsin
|
Posted: Fri Jun 09, 2006 3:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
From:
http://www.tech-session.com/kb/index.php?page=index_v2&id=62&c=4
"Most US models came from the factory with positive rake set to the rear... this is due to US bumper height restrictions. The top edge of the bumpers were set to: 522 +/-20mm Rear, 526 +/-20mm Front (533 +/-20mm for S2)." _________________ White 87 924S "Ghost"
Silver 98 986 3.6l 320 HP "Frank N Stein"
White 01 986 "Christine"
Polar Silver 02 996TT. "Turbo"
Owned and repaired 924s since 1977
Porsche: It's not driving, it's therapy. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Kevin D
Joined: 28 Jul 2005 Posts: 152 Location: Boise, ID
|
Posted: Mon Jun 12, 2006 1:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks Paul. I checked out the link and found another article specifically for measuring body height.
http://www.tech-session.com/kb/index.php?page=index_v2&id=67&c=4
According to their "ideal" ride height, my front is 0.5" high and the rear is perfect. Measuring to the rear torsion tube he lists 9" and to the bottom of the control arm bolts he lists 5.125" as ideal. I was 9" at the rear but 5.625" at the control arm. So measuring to the bottom edge of the body, according to this article, the front should be close to 0.5" lower than the rear. _________________ '88 924S 3L 6sp RedRat
'92 Duc 900ss
'02 Duc 998 Carbon
'72 RD 350 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
924RACR

Joined: 29 Jul 2001 Posts: 9111 Location: Royal Oak, MI, USA
|
Posted: Mon Jun 12, 2006 10:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Generally handles better when it's level... a little more weight on the rear, keeps it planted. _________________ Vaughan Scott
Webmeister
'79 924 #77 SCCA H Prod racecar
'82 931 Plat. Silver
#25 Hidari Firefly P2 sports prototype |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Kevin D
Joined: 28 Jul 2005 Posts: 152 Location: Boise, ID
|
Posted: Tue Jun 13, 2006 2:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
That makes sense to me.
So those of you that have DE cars that you still drive on the road, how low have you dropped the body? Am I at the limit at 6" to the bottom edge of the body? It seems I don't have a lot of travel as it is and going much lower would limit me to track conditions. _________________ '88 924S 3L 6sp RedRat
'92 Duc 900ss
'02 Duc 998 Carbon
'72 RD 350 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|