Show full size 924Board.org
Discussion Forum of 924.org
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
 Technical FAQ924 FAQ (Technical)   Technical924 Technical Section   Jump to 924.org924.org   Jump to PCA 924 Registry924 Registry

Carfax Report.. a little fishy

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    924Board.org Forum Index -> General Discussions
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Pca944  



Joined: 11 Jul 2005
Posts: 180
Location: SoCal

PostPosted: Fri Jan 27, 2006 5:25 pm    Post subject: Carfax Report.. a little fishy Reply with quote

So,

I had a carfax check on the 1982 931 I recently purchased and the history showed up as the following:

12/09/1995 6,331 California
Inspection Station
Sacramento, CA

Passed emissions inspection
-----------------------------------
11/11/1997 14,649 California
Inspection Station
Sacramento, CA

Failed emissions inspection
-----------------------------------
11/13/1997 14,688 California
Inspection Station
Sacramento, CA

Passed emissions inspection
-----------------------------------
10/27/1998 22,155 California
Inspection Station
Sacramento, CA

Passed emissions inspection
-----------------------------------
10/24/2000 Vehicle Repair Center
Strawberry Valley, CA

Vehicle serviced
-----------------------------------
10/24/2000 37,704 California
Inspection Station
Strawberry Valley, CA
Passed emissions inspection

What should I make of this? The car has been parked for the last 4 years (apparently five) and it shows 37xxx when I saw it last week. Now did I somehow get lucky and find a 931 with 37k original miles or was the car somewhere else before 1995? The VIN number is WP0AA0936CN150250 . So what is the true history of this car?

Thanks
_________________
1986 944 | 1978 924 (FS) | 1982 931 | 1980 931
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
flosho  



Joined: 01 Jul 2004
Posts: 3160
Location: Eau Claire, Wisconsin

PostPosted: Sat Jan 28, 2006 4:44 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Well its wierd that the first owners never had it serviced or what not, 37k miles is not much but that could be 137k if it was driven much before 95. With 37k its about 2k miles a year.. which is entirely possible..
_________________
[This Space For Rent]
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
-nick  



Joined: 16 Nov 2002
Posts: 2699
Location: Cambridge, MA

PostPosted: Sat Jan 28, 2006 5:35 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

A 35k mile 931 would be PRISTINE and probably fetch $5k (or more?). The difference between 35k and 135k should be as obvious as a brick to the head

nick
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Diesel  



Joined: 03 Nov 2002
Posts: 1061
Location: Ellington,CT

PostPosted: Sat Jan 28, 2006 5:59 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

11/11/1997 14,649 California
Inspection Station
Sacramento, CA

Failed emissions inspection
-----------------------------------
11/13/1997 14,688 California
Inspection Station
Sacramento, CA


Check the dates.
_________________
Dan Flanagan--2002 VW Jetta TDI, 83 Mercedes 300D,83 Mercedes Euro-240D
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
81turbo  



Joined: 03 Nov 2002
Posts: 1065
Location: Oakland, CA

PostPosted: Sat Jan 28, 2006 6:43 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The car is obviously a 137K car.

Look at the mileage in 1995 6,331. That makes it 487 miles a year over the first 13 years of the cars life. Seems very fishy. Who would start driving a no mile car around?

I bet most segways do more than that!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
gohim  



Joined: 02 Nov 2002
Posts: 4459
Location: Rialto, CA

PostPosted: Sat Jan 28, 2006 8:34 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

If you look at the mileage between smog checks it looks like the car is actually being driven about 8K miles a year.

In 95 it shows 6,XXX miles. The car is an 82, and that makes it about 13 years old by the time the 95 smog check comes up. 13 years old times 8K miles per year is 104K miles.

So by the year 2000, 18 years old times 8K miles per year, total of 144K. Hmm, seems awful close to 137XXX miles, doesn't it?

Coincidence? I don't think so...

Looks like this is a 137K mile car.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
numbbers  



Joined: 05 Nov 2002
Posts: 1910
Location: Highlands Ranch, Colorado

PostPosted: Sat Jan 28, 2006 12:20 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Well, if you think that car went from '82 to '95 with only 6K miles, I have a bridge to sell you.
_________________
1980 924 Turbo
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    924Board.org Forum Index -> General Discussions All times are GMT + 10 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group