 |
924Board.org Discussion Forum of 924.org
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Khal

Joined: 26 Sep 2003 Posts: 4872 Location: Sunny and lovely interior BC, Canada
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
CBass

Joined: 03 Nov 2002 Posts: 2807 Location: Vancouver, Canada
|
Posted: Thu Aug 25, 2005 3:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
A 924 can be a very reliable car, as long as you find a well maintained example. There are lots of them out there, just find one that's not leaking any oil, has had recent brakes, clutch(big job), etc...
Get an '80-82, best option to look for is M471, which are the 5 bolt brakes/wheels. If you can't find a good car with these brakes fitted, you can get them used from a 924 Turbo or an 83-85 944. Takes an afternoon to do the swap.
As for handling vs a 944 or 968, pretty much any 944 or 968 suspension components, with very few exceptions, can be, and alreadly has been installed in a 924 body as an upgrade. You can swap over the alloy trailing arms, 944 brakes, any spring or strut combination, with some modifications... At the end of the day, the 924 is lighter, and any flares that fit on a 944 will fit on a 924.
As for straightline speed, we have more than one member here who has swapped a smallblock chevrolet engine into a 924, and you are dreaming if you think Porsche engineering is so much better than the vast domestic aftermarket that they can extract more power out of a < 3.5 liter 4 cylinder than you can get out of a 7.5 liter smalblock V8.
Now, engine swaps are by no means an easy undertaking, but they're not impossible. I wouldn't recommend to anyone getting their first car to think about getting a 924 and swapping in an engine, as that's a PROJECT, and not a DAILY DRIVER, believe me, I know.
That being said, it's not difficult to fabricate the things you need to do that, if you have the skill set and the tools at your disposal.
The 944 stock for stock, is a better performing car than the 924. It's also more expensive to purchase and maintain, and more difficult to work on. If you want to get into modifications, the 924 has a major advantage over the 944 in a lighter curb weight. My 924 tips the scales at 2350lbs wet, and I have VERY little money into weight savings. With $1000, I could get that to under 2200lbs.
At the end of the day, my 924 is cheap to run, and loads of fun. I don't mind that a 944 has slightly better grip, or better low end torque than my modified 2.0 liter. I don't have a 924 to win bragging rights or bench race, I have it because it's a load of fun, cheap to run as a VW if you know where to get your parts....
Cheap, fun, awesome handling, great potential for chassis modification, members here have proven it's possible to extract double the stock output from a 924 turbo with the right modifications... The performance is there if you're savvy and have the money. _________________ '81 931 in various states of assembly |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SoCalLove
Joined: 23 Aug 2005 Posts: 14
|
Posted: Fri Aug 26, 2005 3:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
Okay, thanks. One final question, I know that 924's cannot be made ridiculously fast but could they be made fast enough to keep up with a Honda Accord or Prelude?
Also, you recommended me the M471. Is this a 924? I tried doing a little research and it seemed like it was a 911. Why would you choose this car over the 924/944?
Thank you. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Chrenan

Joined: 15 Jan 2003 Posts: 3903 Location: Canada
|
Posted: Fri Aug 26, 2005 3:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
Depends where the comparison takes place. On a track I think the answer is yes, given the very capable handling of a 924 with well tuned suspension. Stop light to stop light, I'm not sure, the 924 (or any transaxle car for that matter) does not make a good drag car.
Let's put it this way, on some very empty rural highways where I live, I have cruised comfortably in my 924 at 100 to 110 mph. I'm not sure I would be comfortable doing that in many cars. The 924 chassis seems very comfortable with high speeds, which may not be the case with a Honda Accord or Prelude. _________________ 1987 951 - M193 Version for Japan |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SoCalLove
Joined: 23 Aug 2005 Posts: 14
|
Posted: Fri Aug 26, 2005 3:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Okay, thanks. I meant mostly for just stop light to stop light. The highest we would probably ever reach consistently is 70-80 MPH. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Lizard

Joined: 03 Nov 2002 Posts: 9364 Location: Abbotsford BC. Canada
|
Posted: Fri Aug 26, 2005 5:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
stoplight to stoplight, against those cars is impractical, however you do have an advantace with torque against those cars, so if you MUST drag them take off the line quick get upto the posted speed limit (30mph?) and stay there, you will get the jump on them and get ahead and it will make them think you just dont consider them much of a challange
the M471 is an option on the 924 line. basically it means that the car has disc brakes at all 4 corners, which is a VAST braking improvement. _________________ 3 928s, |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
CBass

Joined: 03 Nov 2002 Posts: 2807 Location: Vancouver, Canada
|
Posted: Fri Aug 26, 2005 6:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
the 924 disc/drum brakes provide plenty of stopping power, but the 4 wheel disc (M471) is good for ease of maintenance, you don't have to adjust teh rear brakes, as you have to with drums.
You can make a 924 as fast as you'd like, depending on your resources. It's not hard to convert the car to electronic fuel injection. A few modifications to the cylinder head, such as a little porting work, a better breathing camshaft, and then better flowing exhaust will net a noticeable power gain. If you throw in a nitrous kit on top of that, you'll be able to smoke an accord or prelude at a light, unless it has been tuned well.
You can buy aftermarket exhaust from a few places, the EFI can be put together for around $500 USD, although it is somewhat of an undertaking to do the conversion, requires a bit of knowledge... The headwork is best left to a professional, unless you are willing to garner a certain level of understanding of fluid dynamics, and concepts such as flow vs port velocity, etc...
Think about keeping it reliable, and getting the chassis tuned the way it was meant to be. Once you can control the car like your arms and legs, and trust me, you will be able to, then you can start adding more power.  _________________ '81 931 in various states of assembly |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SoCalLove
Joined: 23 Aug 2005 Posts: 14
|
Posted: Fri Aug 26, 2005 7:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks so much guys. What do you think it would run in the 1/4 mile if I just stick on the usual exhuast, intake, etc? Also, how much horsepower does the M471 have? Is it the same as the standard 924 (95 HP or something, right?)?
CBass, do you think that a 924 would make a good car/daily driver? The only big thing that I'm worried about right now is that insurance may kill me although I'm not sure yet, I still need to get quotes. They just might think young kid, first car, porshce...
Thanks so much guys! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ozarknight

Joined: 27 Jul 2005 Posts: 27 Location: Rolla, MO
|
Posted: Fri Aug 26, 2005 7:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
My choice was an 88 924S. I found one that had been extremely well maintained. The previous owner had done a few mods and was more meticulous than I'll ever be. He didn't think the LED in the lighted key head was bright enough so he replaced it with a very bright blue LED. It's cool but,....
So far the car has been a great daily driver. Two months and 2000 miles later all I've had to do was replace an alternator. Insurance to add the car to my existing policy was $120/6 months. I thought it would be more, but like Peter said I avoided that nasty T word (turbo).
In a previous life I had a 79 924, the 924S is a whole different world. I love it.
Good luck,
Doug _________________ '88 924S Slate Gray Metallic |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Lizard

Joined: 03 Nov 2002 Posts: 9364 Location: Abbotsford BC. Canada
|
Posted: Fri Aug 26, 2005 9:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
quarter mile times, as we have said not a stop light racer, 18 sec plus  _________________ 3 928s, |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SoCalLove
Joined: 23 Aug 2005 Posts: 14
|
Posted: Fri Aug 26, 2005 10:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
Oh dear. Didn't think it'd be that bad. Oh well, I guess I'll have to live with it. Anyways, can anyone answer the HP question for the M471?
Thank you. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
tj924

Joined: 15 Jul 2004 Posts: 957 Location: Toowoomba, Queensland, Australia
|
Posted: Fri Aug 26, 2005 11:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
| SoCalLove wrote: | | ...can anyone answer the HP question for the M471? |
M471 is a factory option of 4-wheel disc brakes. This also updates the wheels from 4-bolt to 5-bolt. There is no HP improvement. _________________ TJ
Silver '82 924 NA 5-Speed Manual |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Khal

Joined: 26 Sep 2003 Posts: 4872 Location: Sunny and lovely interior BC, Canada
|
Posted: Fri Aug 26, 2005 11:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Lizard wrote: | | 18 sec plus... |
That's being generous! The factory quotes the Turbo at 16-something, right?
For a 20+ year old car, they're not slow. Compared to any new sports car, they're really, really not fast in straight line... but they corner like a cat on a rug!
SoCalLove, you may have missed the the deal with the M471 option. As tj924 says, it's basically just a brake upgrade. And it was an option on the 924 Turbo, not a model of Porsche. The parts can be retro-fitted to the 924, seems quite a common upgrade. Won't make you go faster  _________________ '80 924 Turbo |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SoCalLove
Joined: 23 Aug 2005 Posts: 14
|
Posted: Fri Aug 26, 2005 12:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Wait so it's an aftermarket upgrade? Anyways, I didn't know if he was talking about the Turbo or non-Turbo so I didn't know how much HP it would have... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Khal

Joined: 26 Sep 2003 Posts: 4872 Location: Sunny and lovely interior BC, Canada
|
Posted: Fri Aug 26, 2005 5:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| SoCalLove wrote: | | Wait so it's an aftermarket upgrade? |
No, it's a factory-supplied option. Long story short; In the U.S. the first Turbo's were available with the brakes from the 924 i.e. discs up front but drums on the rear. So the factory offered the discs all 'round setup as an option. The rest of the world got the "full" Turbo package i.e. disc brakes all 'round.
That's a real quick'n nasty description but there are many posts here about what the M471 option is, just do a search, you'll find heaps.
The M471 parts (essentially the disc brakes off the Turbo's) are transferrable to the 924, so many people get the disc brakes off the 924 Turbo and put 'em on their 924's. Bolt-on brake upgrade!
The discs all 'round setup also had the advantage of five-bolt hubs instead of the four-bolt hubs on the standard 924, which means you get access to a wider range of wheels, both factory and aftermarket.
| SoCalLove wrote: | | Anyways, I didn't know if he was talking about the Turbo or non-Turbo so I didn't know how much HP it would have... |
In the U.S., the first 924's had 95hp. Then they went up to 115hp, I think.
The Turbo's had at least 150hp in the U.S. and were 170hp or over for the rest of the world.
The '81 or '82 Turbo's are the pick of the bunch, performance-wise. The 924S is arguably a better car but you can get easy horsepower out of a Turbo and it'll be cheaper in general, too. _________________ '80 924 Turbo |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|